Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1718
Thanks @trixpan! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1718
Yes that was a typo. Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1718
@mcgilman I suspect when you wrote `DocumentTypeDTO` you meant
`DocumentedTypeDTO`? If that is the case, hopefully this address the comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1718
@mcgilman - will adjust
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1718
Ok sounds good. Let's proceed with this PR and then we can file another
JIRA for the UI work.
I just started reviewing and noticed that the `DocumentTypeDTO` is missing
the deprecation flag.
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1718
@mcgilman Thank you for looking at this. Yes, I would say as long this part
is ok we could merge. I also would prefer having the UI work done separately.
Cheers
---
If your project is set up
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1718
@trixpan How did you want to handle this PR? Should we get this part merged
into master and then the UI work can follow? The only reason this might be a
good idea is that we won't have to struggle to
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1718
@mcgilman
based on the following screenshot( this is a snipped of data related to a
locally deprecated `ListenLumberjack`) I suspect this should be a good starting
point for the UX work (I'v