[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Matt Burgess updated NIFI-5524:
-------------------------------
    Description: 
Currently UpdateRecord requires the user to know the input schema in order to 
specify any fields to be added, either by adding them as optional/nullable on 
the input schema, or knowing they will exist in the output schema, and thus 
adding them there (as an extension of the input schema).

A common use case is to infer the schema (or otherwise not easily ascertain the 
input schema) and add field(s). It would be of great benefit if UpdateRecord 
could also modify the output schema (especially if inherited from the input 
schema, but of course open for discussion) to include any added fields. This 
would remove the requirement for users to know the input/output schemas ahead 
of time; rather the output fields would simply be added to the output schema 
(if they don't already exist).

With great power comes great responsibility; clearly if a field is to be 
added/updated using a RecordPath expression that perhaps evaluates to multiple 
nodes, the behavior needs to be defined and documented. This Jira proposes to 
cover the most common use cases of adding/updating fields by also 
adding/updating schema elements where prudent.

  was:
Currently UpdateRecord requires the user to know the input schema in order to 
specify any fields to be added, either by adding them as optional/nullable on 
the input schema, or knowing they will exist in the output schema, and thus 
adding them there (as an extension of the input schema).

A common use case is to infer the schema (or otherwise not easily ascertain the 
input schema) and add field(s). It would be of great benefit if UpdateRecord 
could also modify the output schema (especially if inherited from the input 
schema, but of course open for discussion) to include any added fields. This 
would remove the requirement for users to know the input/output schemas ahead 
of time; rather the output fields would simply be added to the output schema 
(if they don't already exist).

With great power comes great responsibility; clearly if a field is to be 
added/updated using a RecordPath expression that perhaps evaluates to multiple 
nodes, the behavior may well be undefined (although hopefully documented). This 
Jira proposes to cover the most common use cases of adding/updating fields by 
also adding/updating schema elements where prudent.


> Allow UpdateRecord to modify the schema where prudent
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-5524
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5524
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Extensions
>            Reporter: Matt Burgess
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently UpdateRecord requires the user to know the input schema in order to 
> specify any fields to be added, either by adding them as optional/nullable on 
> the input schema, or knowing they will exist in the output schema, and thus 
> adding them there (as an extension of the input schema).
> A common use case is to infer the schema (or otherwise not easily ascertain 
> the input schema) and add field(s). It would be of great benefit if 
> UpdateRecord could also modify the output schema (especially if inherited 
> from the input schema, but of course open for discussion) to include any 
> added fields. This would remove the requirement for users to know the 
> input/output schemas ahead of time; rather the output fields would simply be 
> added to the output schema (if they don't already exist).
> With great power comes great responsibility; clearly if a field is to be 
> added/updated using a RecordPath expression that perhaps evaluates to 
> multiple nodes, the behavior needs to be defined and documented. This Jira 
> proposes to cover the most common use cases of adding/updating fields by also 
> adding/updating schema elements where prudent.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to