Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1279
Thanks @markap14! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1287
Authorizing restricted components on snippet usage
NIFI-3135:
- Authorizing restricted components on snippet usage.
- Ensuring REST API docs accordingly.
You can merge this pull request
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1275
Add support for LDAPS
NIFI-2325:
- Adding support for LDAPS.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mcgilman/nifi NIFI-2325
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1300
Yep, looks good to me as well. Please merge @bbende. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1300
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1297#discussion_r90964719
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-framework-core/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/controller/FlowController.java
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1279
The proposed change definitely addressing the issue. Things looked great
when I was verifying in standalone mode. However, when running clustered the
transmitting flag does not seem accurate
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1399
NIFI-3251: Updating authorization requirements for removing components
- Requiring WRITE permissions to the parent resource when attempting to
remove a component.
- Updating expired
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1384
The code changes look good. Will have @andrewmlim review as well since he
created the JIRA. May need to update some wording for consistency throughout
the application. For instance, template
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1384
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1337
The PR has been updated. Discovered a separate issue that I've created
another JIRA [1] for which can be addressed later.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3272
---
If your
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1322
Thanks @scottyaslan! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1340
NIFI-2967: Disabling Add button in new component dialog when appropriate
NIFI-2967:
- Disabling the Add button in the new Processor, Controller Service, and
Reporting Task dialog when
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1334
Thanks for checking back and providing these details. I think the button is
wrapping to the next line. We've seen this sort of thing in the past. In fact,
we just merged in a PR that addressed
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1303
Thanks @YolandaMDavis. Will update.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1337
Please hold off on reviewing this PR. The issue also occurs in the Cluster
view and the proposed solution needs to be updated to account for that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1353
NIFI-3247: Removing unnecessary authorization check during second phase of
connection creation
NIFI-3247:
- Removing unnecessary authorization check during second phase of
connection creation
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1354
Will review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1303
The PR has been updated. Thanks again!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1354
Thanks @scottyaslan! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1334
Thanks for the feedback. That button is present based on the users
permission to modify the template [1]. Looking at the screenshot, the button
has been added to the DOM so the permissions
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1600
Thanks @scottyaslan. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1601
Thanks @alopresto. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1616
Thanks @joewitt! Will update accordingly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1620
NIFI-3421: Preventing successive attempts to create a FlowController
NIFI-3421:
- On contextDestroyed, referencing beans created during contextInitialized
to prevent successive attempts
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1622
@trixpan Totally forgot to add the 'This closes...' bit to the commit
message. Can you please close the PR? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1622
Thanks @trixpan! This has been merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1559
Thanks @scottyaslan. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1616
NIFI-3272: GC stats in Cluster view
NIFI-3272:
- Adding explicit support for the default and G1 garbage collector in the
JVM tab of the cluster table.
You can merge this pull request
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1622
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1635
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1622
@trixpan Thanks for the PR. Everything functions correctly but behind the
scenes we were recording observers for the NONE log level because the observers
are registered according to the severity
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1616
Rebased, squashed, and pushed. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1616
@joewitt I took a different approach. Please pull down the latest and
re-review. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1626
NIFI-3643: Fixing capitalization in Java Property
NIFI-3643:
- Addressing incorrect capitalization in VersionInfoDTO in NiFiVersion.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1627
NIFI-3380: Fixing paths in generated documentation
NIFI-3380:
- Addressing issues with paths in generated documentation.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1635
@bbende The code changes look good. However, I think the implication of the
using the `RequiresInstanceClassLoading` annotation with the
`cloneDuringInstanceClassLoading` flag on an NAR could lead
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1600
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1601
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1585#discussion_r105980001
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-ui/src/main/webapp/js/jquery/propertytable/jquery.propertytable.js
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1585#discussion_r105980032
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-ui/src/main/resources/filters/canvas.properties
---
@@ -28,6 +28,7
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1599
NIFI-3615: Removing hidden control characters
NIFI-3615:
- Removing hidden control characters.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1635
I think the proposed solution will offer clear, concise rules for when
resources are cloned. It also offers further granularity has it puts the
cloning of the parent resources in control
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1647
NIFI-3664: - UI Timestamp Issue
NIFI-3664:
- Updating the unmarshalling to consider the current date when parsing the
time.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1648
NIFI-2940: Accessing history for deleted components
NIFI-2940:
- Allowing access to configuration actions through the Controller when the
underlying component has been removed.
You can merge
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1651
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1653
NIFI-2940: Fixing broken integration test following changes introduced in
NIFI-2940
- Fixing broken integration test following changes introduced in NIFI-2940.
You can merge this pull request
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1635
Thanks @bbende. This looks good. It has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1651
Thanks @olegz. This has been merged into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1635
Thanks will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1672
NIFI-3705: Using consistent logic when verifying connection creation
NIFI-3705:
- Using consistent logic when verifying connection creation. Removed some
unnecessary checks as verification has
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1684
NIFI-3380: Fixing usage links from Controller Service and Reporting Tasks
tables
NIFI-3380:
- Fixing opening of Usage from the Controller Service and Reporting Task
table.
You can merge
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1685
Thanks @scottyaslan! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1685
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1306
Thanks for the updates. Continuing to follow up on the partial update... is
there a reason that batchCount, batchSize, and batchDuration must be updated as
a single unit? Should a user not but able
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1659
Thanks guys. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1673
NIFI-3706: Removing non-existent resource when converting a legacy
authorized users file
- Removing non-existent resource when converting a legacy authorized users
file.
You can merge this pull
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1306
Thanks for rebasing... Will review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1306#discussion_r112474822
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/dao/impl
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1306#discussion_r112466638
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/audit/RemoteProcessGroupAuditor.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1306#discussion_r112461210
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-client-dto/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/dto/RemoteProcessGroupPortDTO.java
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1306
So far the changes look good. One suggestion I'd like to offer is rendering
something in this batch settings when there is nothing configured. Typically,
we use a string like 'No value set' or relay
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1687
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1687
Thanks @scottyaslan. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1582
I left this guidance on the JIRA for anyone testing/reviewing...
> Feel free to apply the server side changes first. This should prevent
NiFi from getting into this state. You should
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1582
NIFI-3575: Prevent unintended move events
- Verify that when moving a snippet, we do not attempt to move a process
group into itself.
- Update the UI to ensure a subsequent move event cannot
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1574
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1572
Thanks @jvwing! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1574
Thanks @apiri! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1590
NIFI-3244: Updating rendering of parent of Controller Service
NIFI-3244:
- Updating Controller Service scope header.
- Rendering the name of the parent when possible.
- Fixing the check
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1593
NIFI-3245: Controller Service availability note
NIFI-3245:
- Adding notes to the controller service tables to better define their
availability.
- Clarifying support of Safari.
You can
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1594
NIFI-3246: Prevent editing of inherited Controller Services
NIFI-3246:
- Preventing the editing of controller services that are defined in an
ancestor process group.
- Adding a go to link
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1572
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1591
NIFI-3243: Rendering the selected Process Group in the header if possible
NIFI-3243:
- Rendering the selected Process Group in the header if possible.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1585#discussion_r105758869
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-ui/pom.xml
---
@@ -440,6 +440,7
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1585#discussion_r105759544
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-ui/src/main/webapp/js/nf/canvas/nf-actions.js
---
@@ -1214,6 +1217,23
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1555
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1555
Thanks @markap14. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1559
Will Review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1560
Will Review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1560
Thanks @scottyaslan! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1644
@trixpan Sorry for the delay, I must have missed the mention on this PR.
Evaluating EL can lead to different types of Exceptions depending on the
issue with the statement
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1657
NIFI-3683: Ensuring the correct policy is displayed
NIFI-3683:
- Ensuring we use the appropriate action based on the previously displayed
policy.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130962746
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
9.4.3.v20170317
4.10.4
4.2.4.RELEASE
-4.0.3.RELEASE
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130962379
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-security/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/security/oidc
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130871309
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/AccessResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130873359
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/AccessResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/3#discussion_r131141483
--- Diff:
nifi-registry-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/registry/NiFiRegistry.java
---
@@ -18,22 +18,69 @@
import
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/3#discussion_r131150677
--- Diff:
nifi-registry-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/registry/NiFiRegistry.java
---
@@ -43,28 +90,242 @@ public void run
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047
NIFI-4210: Add support for OpenId Connect
NIFI-4210:
- Introducing support for OpenId Connect.
- Updating REST API and UI to support the authorization code flow.
You can merge this pull
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2044
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r131135419
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-security/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/security/oidc
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/3
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2087
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2072
NIFI-3232: Adding support for cascading sub context menus
NIFI-3232:
- Adding support for cascading sub context menus.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/1
Thanks @bbende! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1872#discussion_r127739416
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-framework-cluster/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/cluster/coordination/http/endpoints
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1872#discussion_r127742238
--- Diff:
nifi-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/controller/status/ProcessorStatus.java
---
@@ -234,6 +245,7 @@ public ProcessorStatus clone
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1872#discussion_r127741268
--- Diff:
nifi-framework-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/controller/status/history/StatusHistory.java
---
@@ -41,4 +41,9 @@
* @return List
401 - 500 of 1112 matches
Mail list logo
