https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127459
oooforum (fr) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127459
oooforum (fr) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |NOT_AN_ISSUE
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127459
Peter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||legi...@gmail.com
--- Comment #13 from Peter ---
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127459
jari.koso...@rayence.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127459
--- Comment #11 from oooforum (fr) ---
I don't understand what you mean. As said before, Excel and Calc are treated
CORREL function identically.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127459
--- Comment #9 from jari.koso...@rayence.com ---
Created attachment 86161
--> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=86161&action=edit
test with same y-scale and same y-direction noise
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the as
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127459
--- Comment #8 from jari.koso...@rayence.com ---
Created attachment 86160
--> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=86160&action=edit
test case with different y-scale, but noise only on y-axis direction
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127459
--- Comment #10 from jari.koso...@rayence.com ---
I guess it works only, if both y-scale and y-direction noise is same (only
X-axis data can be scaled)
The noise and scaling can not be on both axis, with the equation used. This
might be quite good
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127459
--- Comment #7 from jari.koso...@rayence.com ---
Created attachment 86159
--> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=86159&action=edit
test case 2 with selectable origin
This shows that CORREL -results do not depend on the data position, on
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127459
--- Comment #6 from jari.koso...@rayence.com ---
The correlation does not depend on the position of the data and thus is not
sensitive to the translation of the data.
However rotation of the data changes the CORREL-function results.
This can be rig
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127459
--- Comment #5 from jari.koso...@rayence.com ---
Created attachment 86158
--> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=86158&action=edit
test case 2 with origin selectable
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127459
oooforum (fr) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ooofo...@free.fr
--- Comment #4 from ooofo
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127459
--- Comment #3 from mroe ---
I don't know what the values should be … but maybe the numerator 1 in the
formulae for y' should be the slope like for x'?
Simply insert a X-Y chart for x'/y' and look if you get expected results.
Otherwise make your o
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127459
--- Comment #2 from jari.koso...@rayence.com ---
In the test case "CORREL_FUNC_TEST_CASE.ods", the target would be
to get the cell C27 value to be the same as the cell K27 value,
even the slope of the fitted data is different for the left table dat
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127459
jari.koso...@rayence.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Issue Type|DEFECT |ENHANCEMENT
--- Comment #1 from
15 matches
Mail list logo
