[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16032427#comment-16032427
]
Hadoop QA commented on SENTRY-1784:
---
Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16032228#comment-16032228
]
Na Li commented on SENTRY-1771:
---
We should add code at the client side to catch it if there are more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16032192#comment-16032192
]
kalyan kumar kalvagadda commented on SENTRY-1788:
-
@akolb I will update the patch for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16032158#comment-16032158
]
Hadoop QA commented on SENTRY-1788:
---
Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16032150#comment-16032150
]
Alexander Kolbasov commented on SENTRY-1784:
[~lina.li] Thank you for the explanation. It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16032082#comment-16032082
]
Hadoop QA commented on SENTRY-1781:
---
Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16031921#comment-16031921
]
Na Li commented on SENTRY-1784:
---
[~akolb] the requested ID is always the (returned latest changeID from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
kalyan kumar kalvagadda updated SENTRY-1788:
Attachment: SENTRY-1788.003.patch
> Sentry Store may use JDO object after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16031889#comment-16031889
]
Sergio Peña commented on SENTRY-1784:
-
SENTRY-1760 will use a new ID to verify whether a full
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
kalyan kumar kalvagadda updated SENTRY-1788:
Attachment: SENTRY-1788.003.patch
> Sentry Store may use JDO object after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sergio Peña updated SENTRY-1781:
Attachment: SENTRY-1781.1-sentry-ha-redesign.patch
Re-attaching file to run the tests again. This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16031872#comment-16031872
]
Na Li commented on SENTRY-1784:
---
[~akolb] with the code change, when there is no change, the requested ID
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16031857#comment-16031857
]
Na Li commented on SENTRY-1771:
---
[~akolb] The patch and review are not up to date. I have not found the fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16031851#comment-16031851
]
Sergio Peña commented on SENTRY-1784:
-
Got it. I understand the problem now. Seems this issue will go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Na Li updated SENTRY-1771:
--
Attachment: (was: SENTRY-1771.002-sentry-ha-redesign.patch)
> HDFS client concurrently requests full
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Na Li updated SENTRY-1771:
--
Attachment: (was: SENTRY-1771.001-sentry-ha-redesign.patch)
> HDFS client concurrently requests full
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16031850#comment-16031850
]
Alexander Kolbasov commented on SENTRY-1744:
[~spena] Good question - I asked the question in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16031848#comment-16031848
]
Alexander Kolbasov commented on SENTRY-404:
---
Can anyone comment why the decision was made to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16031845#comment-16031845
]
Alexander Kolbasov commented on SENTRY-1784:
[~lina.li] What would be the requested ID after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexander Kolbasov updated SENTRY-1771:
---
Summary: HDFS client concurrently requests full permission update multiple
times
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16031823#comment-16031823
]
Alexander Kolbasov commented on SENTRY-1771:
[~lina.li] Is the attached patch and review
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexander Kolbasov reassigned SENTRY-1735:
--
Assignee: Alexander Kolbasov (was: Viktor Somogyi)
> Sentry Clients should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16031815#comment-16031815
]
Alexander Kolbasov commented on SENTRY-1735:
[~viktorsomogyi] Thank you for volunteering to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexander Kolbasov updated SENTRY-1735:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Sentry Clients should not log every connection
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexander Kolbasov updated SENTRY-1735:
---
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug)
Parent: SENTRY-872
> Sentry Clients should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16031779#comment-16031779
]
Alexander Kolbasov commented on SENTRY-1790:
Can you clarify why
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexander Kolbasov updated SENTRY-1789:
---
Affects Version/s: sentry-ha-redesign
1.8.0
> Sentry/Kafka
Na Li created SENTRY-1790:
-
Summary: NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/sentry/binding/hive/SentryOnFailureHookContextImpl
Key: SENTRY-1790
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1790
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16031426#comment-16031426
]
Sergio Peña commented on SENTRY-1784:
-
[~LinaAtAustin] I took a look at the old code, but I don't see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16031321#comment-16031321
]
Na Li commented on SENTRY-1773:
---
That will minimize the chance we have to take full snapshot. The idea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viktor Somogyi reassigned SENTRY-1735:
--
Assignee: Viktor Somogyi
> Sentry Clients should not log every connection request
>
31 matches
Mail list logo