[jira] [Commented] (SENTRY-1964) HDFS sync does not need partition locations (usually)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16256448#comment-16256448 ] Na Li commented on SENTRY-1964: --- [~akolb] the only problem is the scenario that the table l

[jira] [Commented] (SENTRY-1964) HDFS sync does not need partition locations (usually)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16256443#comment-16256443 ] Na Li commented on SENTRY-1964: --- The problem is to find the authObj from path. For example

[jira] [Commented] (SENTRY-1964) HDFS sync does not need partition locations (usually)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16256328#comment-16256328 ] Alexander Kolbasov commented on SENTRY-1964: I think NameNode should apply AC

[jira] [Commented] (SENTRY-1964) HDFS sync does not need partition locations (usually)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16256177#comment-16256177 ] Na Li commented on SENTRY-1964: --- [~akolb]Encounter an issue in the following scenario when

[jira] [Commented] (SENTRY-1964) HDFS sync does not need partition locations (usually)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16254420#comment-16254420 ] Hadoop QA commented on SENTRY-1964: --- Here are the results of testing the latest attachm

[jira] [Commented] (SENTRY-1964) HDFS sync does not need partition locations (usually)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16254240#comment-16254240 ] Hadoop QA commented on SENTRY-1964: --- Here are the results of testing the latest attachm

[jira] [Commented] (SENTRY-1964) HDFS sync does not need partition locations (usually)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16252907#comment-16252907 ] Hadoop QA commented on SENTRY-1964: --- Here are the results of testing the latest attachm

[jira] [Commented] (SENTRY-1964) HDFS sync does not need partition locations (usually)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16252771#comment-16252771 ] Alexander Kolbasov commented on SENTRY-1964: [~Tagar] What you are describing

[jira] [Commented] (SENTRY-1964) HDFS sync does not need partition locations (usually)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16181609#comment-16181609 ] Ruslan Dautkhanov commented on SENTRY-1964: --- What if we have a table that's par

[jira] [Commented] (SENTRY-1964) HDFS sync does not need partition locations (usually)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16181565#comment-16181565 ] Alexander Kolbasov commented on SENTRY-1964: The only exception is some parti