HoustonPutman commented on PR #507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/507#issuecomment-1364413354
Ok smoketester usage is now completely covered by the e2e tests. This should
be pretty close to merging in early january once we have some other eyes on it!
Btw https://gi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17651720#comment-17651720
]
Mikhail Khludnev edited comment on SOLR-788 at 12/23/22 8:15 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17651720#comment-17651720
]
Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-788:
---
Meanwhile I feel lack of participation and h
HoustonPutman merged PR #509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/509
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@s
dsmiley commented on code in PR #1248:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1248#discussion_r1056534772
##
solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/impl/CloudSolrClient.java:
##
@@ -1222,11 +1222,22 @@ public boolean isDirectUpdatesToLeadersOnly() {
/**
* If c
HoustonPutman commented on PR #509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/509#issuecomment-1364151186
> maybe next time we could put some of the more cosmetic improvements in
their own commit, but it seems pretty harmless here.
Good call, just included since I was going ma
gerlowskija commented on code in PR #509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/509#discussion_r1056521056
##
controllers/solrbackup_controller.go:
##
@@ -146,7 +145,7 @@ func (r *SolrBackupReconciler) Reconcile(ctx
context.Context, req ctrl.Request)
}
epugh commented on PR #1248:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1248#issuecomment-1364110212
So, `setParallelCacheRefreshes` appears to be a odd setting Does
anyone actually change it/use it? Or do we all just use the default of 3?
There don't appear to be any tests for it..
epugh commented on PR #1248:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1248#issuecomment-1364109540
So...I can't get a clean run of tests on any branch of solr on my
laptop
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
HoustonPutman merged PR #512:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/512
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17651679#comment-17651679
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-16438:
Commit 5
Anna created SOLR-16596:
---
Summary: LTR MultipleAdditiveTreeModel do not support missing
features' value
Key: SOLR-16596
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16596
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
epugh commented on PR #1248:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1248#issuecomment-1363888032
So, with these changes, a lot of tests fail... For example
"DistributedExpandComponentTest"
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17651612#comment-17651612
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-16473:
Commit 6
yauhen-vastraknutau-epam commented on issue #505:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/505#issuecomment-1363738431
Yep, we stick to Solr 8.4.0 but I found that if I deploy 9.x it did security
bootstrapping and I was able to downgrade Solr to 8.4.0 after this. Tried
before 8.8
15 matches
Mail list logo
