TheSench edited a comment on pull request #296:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/296#issuecomment-937823770
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsub
TheSench edited a comment on pull request #296:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/296#issuecomment-937823770
The next Solr 8 would be ideal, but only so that more users can benefit. I'm
using a workaround already on my end, so I wouldn't be personally impacted if
this waited until S
TheSench edited a comment on pull request #296:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/296#issuecomment-937823770
The next Solr 8 would be ideal, but only so that more users can benefit. I'm
using a workaround already on my end, so I wouldn't be personally impacted of
this waited until S
TheSench edited a comment on pull request #296:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/296#issuecomment-937823770
The next Solr 8 would be ideal, but only so that more users can benefit. In
using a workaround already on my end.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic
TheSench edited a comment on pull request #296:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/296#issuecomment-936683714
As an alternate, you can also use this, which _should_ allow unauthenticated
access to listing configSets (and will after the bugfix):
```jsonc
{
"authentication"
TheSench edited a comment on pull request #296:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/296#issuecomment-922010030
> Also, as far as "integration" tests, in the Solr world, we just put them
all together! If it's a long running test, we label them with that attribute,
but in terms of the c
