[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15121968#comment-15121968
]
Cristian commented on SPARK-9301:
-
Seconded, looks like MutableAggregationBuffer is not so mutable after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15035700#comment-15035700
]
Cristian commented on SPARK-11596:
--
That's great, thank you
> SQL execution very slow for nested query
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15034058#comment-15034058
]
Cristian commented on SPARK-11596:
--
Any chance this can be fixed soon ? It looks like a straightforward
Cristian created SPARK-11879:
Summary: Checkpoint support for DataFrame
Key: SPARK-11879
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11879
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15019158#comment-15019158
]
Cristian commented on SPARK-11596:
--
Although you are right that this does not reproduce without caching.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cristian updated SPARK-11596:
-
Description:
For nested query plans like a recursive unionAll, withExecutionId is extremely
slow,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15019096#comment-15019096
]
Cristian commented on SPARK-11596:
--
Sorry, my repro code was missing a cache() statement. I added it now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15019124#comment-15019124
]
Cristian commented on SPARK-11596:
--
An easy way to check this is to run the code in local mode, and when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15019241#comment-15019241
]
Cristian commented on SPARK-11596:
--
Ok, I found a much simpler repro. Note the below does not actually
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15019267#comment-15019267
]
Cristian commented on SPARK-11596:
--
Looks like the problem is here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cristian updated SPARK-11596:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: An easy way to check this is to run the code in local mode, and when it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15012386#comment-15012386
]
Cristian commented on SPARK-11596:
--
This is not what this is about. It's very useful to have UnionAll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cristian updated SPARK-11596:
-
Description:
For nested query plans like a recursive unionAll, withExecutionId is extremely
slow,
Cristian created SPARK-11596:
Summary: SQL execution very slow for nested query plans because of
DataFrame.withNewExecutionId
Key: SPARK-11596
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11596
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cristian updated SPARK-11596:
-
Description:
For nested query plans like a recursive unionAll, withExecutionId is extremely
slow,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14634316#comment-14634316
]
Cristian commented on SPARK-4849:
-
I would argue that the priority for this is not Minor
Cristian created SPARK-8435:
---
Summary: Cannot create tables in an specific database using a
provider
Key: SPARK-8435
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8435
Project: Spark
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14375243#comment-14375243
]
Cristian commented on SPARK-5863:
-
I'm a bit confused. The original jira refers to a very
18 matches
Mail list logo