[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-20853) spark.ui.reverseProxy=true leads to hanging communication to master

2017-08-03 Thread Josh Bacon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16113670#comment-16113670 ] Josh Bacon commented on SPARK-20853: For the record, I'm experiencing the exact same

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16784) Configurable log4j settings

2017-04-11 Thread Josh Bacon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15964471#comment-15964471 ] Josh Bacon commented on SPARK-16784: [~tscholak] I have not created a follow up issu

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16784) Configurable log4j settings

2017-03-13 Thread Josh Bacon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15907766#comment-15907766 ] Josh Bacon commented on SPARK-16784: >From what I've seen, this limitation is also ex

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-18737) Serialization setting "spark.serializer" ignored in Spark 2.x

2016-12-29 Thread Josh Bacon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15785715#comment-15785715 ] Josh Bacon commented on SPARK-18737: I think this issue may be related to the followi

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-18737) Serialization setting "spark.serializer" ignored in Spark 2.x

2016-12-28 Thread Josh Bacon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15783543#comment-15783543 ] Josh Bacon edited comment on SPARK-18737 at 12/28/16 7:39 PM: -

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-18737) Serialization setting "spark.serializer" ignored in Spark 2.x

2016-12-28 Thread Josh Bacon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15783543#comment-15783543 ] Josh Bacon commented on SPARK-18737: Hi Sean, We've perform a more tests and are exp

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-18737) Serialization setting "spark.serializer" ignored in Spark 2.x

2016-12-27 Thread Josh Bacon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15781450#comment-15781450 ] Josh Bacon edited comment on SPARK-18737 at 12/27/16 11:16 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-18737) Serialization setting "spark.serializer" ignored in Spark 2.x

2016-12-27 Thread Josh Bacon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15781450#comment-15781450 ] Josh Bacon commented on SPARK-18737: Thanks for the quick reply, We've cut our code

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-18737) Serialization setting "spark.serializer" ignored in Spark 2.x

2016-12-27 Thread Josh Bacon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15781418#comment-15781418 ] Josh Bacon edited comment on SPARK-18737 at 12/27/16 10:33 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-18737) Serialization setting "spark.serializer" ignored in Spark 2.x

2016-12-27 Thread Josh Bacon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15781418#comment-15781418 ] Josh Bacon commented on SPARK-18737: My team is experiencing the exact same issue as

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-18737) Serialization setting "spark.serializer" ignored in Spark 2.x

2016-12-27 Thread Josh Bacon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15781418#comment-15781418 ] Josh Bacon edited comment on SPARK-18737 at 12/27/16 10:32 PM: