Jungtaek Lim created SPARK-31951:
Summary: Explicitly close iterator in KVStoreView
Key: SPARK-31951
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31951
Project: Spark
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17130059#comment-17130059
]
Jungtaek Lim edited comment on SPARK-31946 at 6/10/20, 4:31 AM:
Oh I see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17130059#comment-17130059
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31946:
--
Oh I see what you meant. Thanks for making it clear. I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17130001#comment-17130001
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31946:
--
It’s intended to take up non-posix compliant signal, AFAIK.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129955#comment-17129955
]
Jungtaek Lim edited comment on SPARK-31946 at 6/10/20, 2:12 AM:
That
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129955#comment-17129955
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31946:
--
That message is intended. It wasn't showing which feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17128707#comment-17128707
]
Jungtaek Lim edited comment on SPARK-31931 at 6/8/20, 11:12 PM:
Well, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17128707#comment-17128707
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31931:
--
Well, I looked into the attached file, and it doesn't show
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17128705#comment-17128705
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31931:
--
Critical+ is reserved for committers. Lowering the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-31931:
-
Priority: Major (was: Blocker)
> When using GCS as checkpoint location for Structured
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-31928:
-
Description:
Test failed:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17127965#comment-17127965
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-17604:
--
The issue is even reported from user group, refer here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-17604:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: The issue is even reported from user group, refer here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17127788#comment-17127788
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-28594:
--
Unfortunately that is most probably the guaranteed way if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17127776#comment-17127776
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-28594:
--
Actually it has been an issue with almost all of Spark
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17120749#comment-17120749
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31812:
--
[~kamrul]
In general Spark project doesn't assign the issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17118244#comment-17118244
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31764:
--
Thanks for confirming. :)
> JsonProtocol doesn't write
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17118201#comment-17118201
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31764:
--
For me this looks to be a bug - the description of PR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17118114#comment-17118114
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31841:
--
It sounds like a question/feature request which is better
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17117400#comment-17117400
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-26646:
--
Still happening.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17117399#comment-17117399
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-29137:
--
Still valid on latest master.
Jungtaek Lim created SPARK-31831:
Summary: Flaky test:
org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.HiveSessionImplSuite.(It is not a test
it is a sbt.testing.SuiteSelector)
Key: SPARK-31831
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17116653#comment-17116653
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-23539:
--
You can ignore the affect version in most cases if the type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17116470#comment-17116470
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31794:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-31793:
-
Fix Version/s: 3.1.0
> Reduce the memory usage in file scan location metadata
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17115080#comment-17115080
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31794:
--
Please read through the doc of these methods, which explain
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113791#comment-17113791
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31792:
--
Fix version is for tracking the version which contains the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-31792:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.0)
> Introduce the structured streaming UI in the Web UI page
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113708#comment-17113708
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31789:
--
critical / blocker are tend to be reserved for committers.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-31789:
-
Priority: Major (was: Blocker)
> SparkSubmitOperator could not get Exit Code after log stream
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113706#comment-17113706
]
Jungtaek Lim edited comment on SPARK-31761 at 5/22/20, 2:58 AM:
Let's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113706#comment-17113706
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31761:
--
Let's make sure priority is marked properly - sounds like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17112816#comment-17112816
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31754:
--
I can also take a look if the input and checkpoint are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17111696#comment-17111696
]
Jungtaek Lim edited comment on SPARK-31754 at 5/20/20, 2:50 AM:
Looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17111696#comment-17111696
]
Jungtaek Lim edited comment on SPARK-31754 at 5/20/20, 2:21 AM:
Looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17111696#comment-17111696
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31754:
--
Looks like the row itself is null which shouldn't happen.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17110873#comment-17110873
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31754:
--
[~puviarasu]
Given the error comes from "generated code",
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-31754:
-
Priority: Major (was: Blocker)
> Spark Structured Streaming: NullPointerException in Stream
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-31257:
-
Summary: Unify create table syntax to fix ambiguous two different CREATE
TABLE syntaxes (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-31257:
-
Affects Version/s: (was: 3.0.0)
3.1.0
Description:
There's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-31722:
-
Component/s: (was: Structured Streaming)
DStreams
> flaky streaming tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-31707:
-
Description:
According to the latest status of discussion in the dev@ mailing list,
[[DISCUSS]
Jungtaek Lim created SPARK-31707:
Summary: Revert SPARK-30098 Use default datasource as provider for
CREATE TABLE syntax
Key: SPARK-31707
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31707
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17106104#comment-17106104
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-29046:
--
Sorry I don't know. Also worth noting that Spark 2.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim resolved SPARK-31698.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
The weird error message and stack trace is matched with SPARK-29046
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17098723#comment-17098723
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-26385:
--
[~rajeevkumar]
Yes please raise a separate JIRA issue.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim resolved SPARK-31599.
--
Resolution: Invalid
> Reading from S3 (Structured Streaming Bucket) Fails after Compaction
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17096483#comment-17096483
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31599:
--
You understand how file stream sink and file source works
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim resolved SPARK-30261.
--
Target Version/s: 2.4.3, 2.3.0 (was: 2.3.0, 2.4.3)
Resolution: Duplicate
> Should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17094925#comment-17094925
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31599:
--
Oh sorry I should guide to user@ mailing list, my bad.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17094915#comment-17094915
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31599:
--
Please post a mail thread on dev@ mailing list. This looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-17604:
-
Affects Version/s: 3.1.0
Labels: (was: bulk-closed)
Priority:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim reopened SPARK-17604:
--
Reopening this, as end user reported this in user mailing list recently.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17092928#comment-17092928
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31559:
--
PR submitted: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28336
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17092012#comment-17092012
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31554:
--
There're two existing PRs addressing the test suite:
Jungtaek Lim created SPARK-31559:
Summary: AM starts with initial fetched tokens in any attempt
Key: SPARK-31559
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31559
Project: Spark
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17091075#comment-17091075
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-26385:
--
The symptoms are mixed up - please clarify whether the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-27891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim resolved SPARK-27891.
--
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
SPARK-23361 is in Spark 2.4.0 and the fix is not going to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17085346#comment-17085346
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31460:
--
1. Please check your app / submit phase doesn't override
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17083856#comment-17083856
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-26646:
--
Looks like still happening on master branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17083857#comment-17083857
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-29222:
--
Still happening on master (3.1.0-SNAPSHOT)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17083855#comment-17083855
]
Jungtaek Lim edited comment on SPARK-29137 at 4/15/20, 6:58 AM:
Still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17083855#comment-17083855
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-29137:
--
Still valid on latest master (3.1.0-SNAPSHOT).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17083849#comment-17083849
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-26385:
--
Probably you may need to share the entire log messages
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17082036#comment-17082036
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31427:
--
Could you please check whether using Spark 3.0 preview 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17077821#comment-17077821
]
Jungtaek Lim edited comment on SPARK-31376 at 4/8/20, 4:46 AM:
---
Btw it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17077821#comment-17077821
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31376:
--
Btw it would be even better if you initiate the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17077819#comment-17077819
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31376:
--
I'm saying that sort is simply unavailable operation for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17077723#comment-17077723
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31376:
--
I'll reflect the question; why do you think not allowing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim resolved SPARK-30436.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
> CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE doesn't work without STORED AS
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17073264#comment-17073264
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31312:
--
No, it wasn't triggered by SPARK-26560 and should be
Jungtaek Lim created SPARK-31312:
Summary: Transforming Hive simple UDF (using JAR) expression may
incur CNFE in later evaluation
Key: SPARK-31312
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31312
Jungtaek Lim created SPARK-31257:
Summary: Fix ambiguous two different CREATE TABLE syntaxes
Key: SPARK-31257
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31257
Project: Spark
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17058333#comment-17058333
]
Jungtaek Lim edited comment on SPARK-31136 at 3/18/20, 8:14 AM:
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17060004#comment-17060004
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-29301:
--
Thanks for reminding. Marked as duplicated.
> Removing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-27648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim resolved SPARK-27648.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
> In Spark2.4 Structured Streaming:The executor storage memory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim resolved SPARK-29301.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
> Removing block is not reflected to the driver/executor's storage
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17059914#comment-17059914
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31136:
--
For 2, I just initiated the discussion thread on dev@ list.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17058573#comment-17058573
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31143:
--
[~shijiezhiai] Could you please leave the information about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17058380#comment-17058380
]
Jungtaek Lim edited comment on SPARK-31136 at 3/13/20, 3:01 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17058380#comment-17058380
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31136:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17058333#comment-17058333
]
Jungtaek Lim edited comment on SPARK-31136 at 3/13/20, 1:34 AM:
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17058333#comment-17058333
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31136:
--
This reminds me about my previous PR:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17057713#comment-17057713
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-25987:
--
The root cause is the way of how "flowAnalysis" in Janino
Jungtaek Lim created SPARK-31115:
Summary: Lots of columns and distinct aggregation functions
triggers compile exception on Janino
Key: SPARK-31115
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31115
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17056465#comment-17056465
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31099:
--
[~dongjoon]
Could you elaborate your comment "Apache Spark
Jungtaek Lim created SPARK-31101:
Summary: Upgrade Janino to 3.1.1
Key: SPARK-31101
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31101
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Dependency upgrade
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-31011:
-
Affects Version/s: (was: 3.0.0)
3.1.0
> Failed to register signal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-30993:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.4.6
> GenerateUnsafeRowJoiner corrupts the value if the datatype is UDF and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17049880#comment-17049880
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-31011:
--
According to the wikipedia, SIGPWR is NOT listed in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17049880#comment-17049880
]
Jungtaek Lim edited comment on SPARK-31011 at 3/3/20 4:11 AM:
--
Jungtaek Lim created SPARK-31014:
Summary: InMemoryStore: CountingRemoveIfForEach misses to remove
key from parentToChildrenMap
Key: SPARK-31014
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31014
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048456#comment-17048456
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-30993:
--
Just confirmed the problem persists in branch-2.3 and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-30993:
-
Affects Version/s: 2.3.4
2.4.5
> GenerateUnsafeRowJoiner corrupts the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048321#comment-17048321
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-30993:
--
During review phase I'll check which versions are affected
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated SPARK-30993:
-
Summary: GenerateUnsafeRowJoiner corrupts the value if the datatype is UDF
and its sql type has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048318#comment-17048318
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-30993:
--
The reporter uses Spark 2.3.0, and validated it exists on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048317#comment-17048317
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-30993:
--
Will submit a PR soon. Btw, it looks to be correctness
Jungtaek Lim created SPARK-30993:
Summary: GenerateUnsafeRowJoiner incorrectly modifies the value if
the datatype is UDF and its sql type has fixed length
Key: SPARK-30993
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17045011#comment-17045011
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on SPARK-24295:
--
[~iqbal_khattra] [~alfredo-gimenez-bv]
Hi, if you're open
1101 - 1200 of 1857 matches
Mail list logo