[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-44152) Upgrade to spark 3.4.0 from 3.3.2 gives Exception in thread "main" java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException: , although jar is present in the location

2023-07-24 Thread Stijn De Haes (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-44152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17746436#comment-17746436 ] Stijn De Haes commented on SPARK-44152: --- We are seeing this issue too, the problem

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-43357) Spark AWS Glue date partition push down broken

2023-05-10 Thread Stijn De Haes (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-43357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17721219#comment-17721219 ] Stijn De Haes commented on SPARK-43357: --- Any chance we could backport this to olde

[jira] [Created] (SPARK-43357) Spark AWS Glue date partition push down broken

2023-05-03 Thread Stijn De Haes (Jira)
Stijn De Haes created SPARK-43357: - Summary: Spark AWS Glue date partition push down broken Key: SPARK-43357 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-43357 Project: Spark Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-32225) Parquet footer information is read twice

2021-12-07 Thread Stijn De Haes (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17454622#comment-17454622 ] Stijn De Haes commented on SPARK-32225: --- Could this be the reason that when you re

[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-32225) Parquet footer information is read twice

2021-12-07 Thread Stijn De Haes (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stijn De Haes updated SPARK-32225: -- Attachment: image-2021-12-07-13-37-12-197.png > Parquet footer information is read twice > ---

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-33077) Spark 3 / Cats 2.2.0 classpath issue

2020-11-24 Thread Stijn De Haes (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17238155#comment-17238155 ] Stijn De Haes commented on SPARK-33077: --- [~srowen] I started to tackle the problem

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-27696) kubernetes driver pod not deleted after finish.

2020-10-08 Thread Stijn De Haes (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-27696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17210232#comment-17210232 ] Stijn De Haes commented on SPARK-27696: --- I think it is best to have TTL controller

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-28360) The serviceAccountName configuration item does not take effect in client mode.

2020-10-08 Thread Stijn De Haes (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17210229#comment-17210229 ] Stijn De Haes commented on SPARK-28360: --- I think it makes sense. If you are runnin

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-32067) Use unique ConfigMap name for executor pod template

2020-10-06 Thread Stijn De Haes (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17209279#comment-17209279 ] Stijn De Haes commented on SPARK-32067: --- [~dongjoon] Ok thank you very much :) >

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-32067) Use unique ConfigMap name for executor pod template

2020-10-05 Thread Stijn De Haes (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17208493#comment-17208493 ] Stijn De Haes commented on SPARK-32067: --- [~dongjoon] if the PR is merged are you f

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-32067) [K8S] Executor pod template ConfigMap of ongoing submission got inadvertently altered by subsequent submission

2020-10-02 Thread Stijn De Haes (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17206082#comment-17206082 ] Stijn De Haes commented on SPARK-32067: --- Also ran into this today. This actually m

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-27996) Spark UI redirect will be failed behind the https reverse proxy

2020-01-02 Thread Stijn De Haes (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-27996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17006823#comment-17006823 ] Stijn De Haes commented on SPARK-27996: --- [~ishikin] I am stumbling on this as well

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-26995) Running Spark in Docker image with Alpine Linux 3.9.0 throws errors when using snappy

2019-02-27 Thread Stijn De Haes (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16779129#comment-16779129 ] Stijn De Haes commented on SPARK-26995: --- You can also add {code:java} ENV LD_LIBRA

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-26995) Running Spark in Docker image with Alpine Linux 3.9.0 throws errors when using snappy

2019-02-26 Thread Stijn De Haes (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16778976#comment-16778976 ] Stijn De Haes commented on SPARK-26995: --- I see your PR did the same > Running Spa

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-26995) Running Spark in Docker image with Alpine Linux 3.9.0 throws errors when using snappy

2019-02-26 Thread Stijn De Haes (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16778972#comment-16778972 ] Stijn De Haes commented on SPARK-26995: --- [~lucacanali] as a temporary fix I added