[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-48610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Wenchen Fan reassigned SPARK-48610:
-----------------------------------
Assignee: Ziqi Liu
> Remove ExplainUtils.processPlan synchronize
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-48610
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-48610
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 4.0.0
> Reporter: Ziqi Liu
> Assignee: Ziqi Liu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> [https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45282] introduced synchronize to
> `ExplainUtils.processPlan` to avoid race condition when multiple queries
> refers to same cached plan.
> The granularity of lock is too large. We can try to fix the root cause of
> this concurrency issue by refactoring the usage of mutable OP_ID_TAG, which
> is not a good practice in terms of immutable nature of SparkPlan. Instead,
> we can use an auxiliary id map, with object identity as the key.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
