[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16344690#comment-16344690
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-23267:
--------------------------------------
User 'gatorsmile' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
> Increase spark.sql.codegen.hugeMethodLimit to 65535
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-23267
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23267
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 2.3.0
> Reporter: Xiao Li
> Assignee: Xiao Li
> Priority: Blocker
>
> Still saw the performance regression introduced by
> `spark.sql.codegen.hugeMethodLimit` in our internal workloads. There are two
> major issues in the current solution.
> * The size of the complied byte code is not identical to the bytecode size
> of the method. The detection is still not accurate.
> * The bytecode size of a single operator (e.g., `SerializeFromObject`) could
> still exceed 8K limit. We saw the performance regression in such scenario.
> Since it is close to the release of 2.3, we decide to increase it to 64K for
> avoiding the perf regression.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
