[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Owen resolved SPARK-21058.
-------------------------------
Resolution: Not A Problem
If there's a specific optimization for large, sparse matrices to discuss, I can
reopen this.
> potential SVD optimization
> --------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-21058
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21058
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ML, MLlib
> Affects Versions: 2.1.1
> Reporter: Vincent
>
> In the current implementation, computeSVD will compute SVD for matrix A by
> computing AT*A first and svd on the Gramian matrix, we found that the Gramian
> matrix computation is the hot spot of the overall SVD computation. While svd
> on the Gramian matrix can benefit svd computation on the skinny matrix, for a
> non-skinny matrix, it could also become a huge overhead. So, is it possible
> to offer another option by computing svd on the original matrix instead of
> the Gramian matrix? We can decide which way to go by the ratio between
> numCols and numRows, or by simply settings from the user.
> We have observed a handsome gain on a toy dataset by svd on the original
> matrix instead of the Gramian matrix, if the proposal is acceptable, we will
> start to work on the patch and gather more performance data.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
