[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-28934) Add `spark.sql.compatiblity.mode`

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16920072#comment-16920072 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-28934: - Hi [~smilegator]! Thanks for opening this. I am wondering

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-28916) Generated SpecificSafeProjection.apply method grows beyond 64 KB when use SparkSQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16920074#comment-16920074 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-28916: - Thanks for reporting this. I am checking it. > Generated

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-28916) Generated SpecificSafeProjection.apply method grows beyond 64 KB when use SparkSQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16920153#comment-16920153 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-28916: - I think the problem is related to subexpression elimination.

[jira] [Created] (SPARK-28939) SQL configuration are not always propagated

Marco Gaido created SPARK-28939: --- Summary: SQL configuration are not always propagated Key: SPARK-28939 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28939 Project: Spark Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-28939) SQL configuration are not always propagated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Gaido updated SPARK-28939: Description: The SQL configurations are propagated to executors in order to be effective.

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-28610) Support larger buffer for sum of long

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16921471#comment-16921471 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-28610: - Hi [~Gengliang.Wang]. That's a different thing. you are doing

[jira] [Resolved] (SPARK-28610) Support larger buffer for sum of long

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Gaido resolved SPARK-28610. - Resolution: Won't Fix Since the perf regression introduced by the change would be very high,

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-29038) SPIP: Support Spark Materialized View

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16926650#comment-16926650 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-29038: - [~cltlfcjin] currently spark has a something similar, which

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-29038) SPIP: Support Spark Materialized View

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16926650#comment-16926650 ] Marco Gaido edited comment on SPARK-29038 at 9/10/19 1:40 PM: -- [~cltlfcjin]

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-29009) Returning pojo from udf not working

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16924774#comment-16924774 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-29009: - Why do you think this is a bug? If you want a struct to be

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-29123) DecimalType multiplication precision loss

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16933128#comment-16933128 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-29123: - You can set

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-28225) Unexpected behavior for Window functions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889518#comment-16889518 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-28225: - Let me cite PostgreSQL documentation to explain you the

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-28225) Unexpected behavior for Window functions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889518#comment-16889518 ] Marco Gaido edited comment on SPARK-28225 at 7/20/19 2:43 PM: -- Let me cite

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-28386) Cannot resolve ORDER BY columns with GROUP BY and HAVING

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889422#comment-16889422 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-28386: - I think this is a duplicate of SPARK-26741. I have a PR for

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-23758) MLlib 2.4 Roadmap

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16886406#comment-16886406 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-23758: - [~dongjoon] seems weird to set the affected version to 3.0

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-28512) New optional mode: throw runtime exceptions on casting failures

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16892692#comment-16892692 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-28512: - Thanks for pinging me [~maropu]. It is not the same issue, I

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-28470) Honor spark.sql.decimalOperations.nullOnOverflow in Cast

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889979#comment-16889979 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-28470: - Thanks for checking this Wenchen! I will work on this ASAP.

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-29123) DecimalType multiplication precision loss

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16933560#comment-16933560 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-29123: - [~benny] the point here is: Spark can represent decimals with

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-28322) DIV support decimal type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16881798#comment-16881798 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-28322: - Thanks for pinging me [~yumwang], I'll work on this on the

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-29667) implicitly convert mismatched datatypes on right side of "IN" operator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16987712#comment-16987712 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-29667: - I can agree more with you [~hyukjin.kwon]. I think that

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-36673) Incorrect Unions of struct with mismatched field name case

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17410488#comment-17410488 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-36673: - AFAIK, in SQL the names in the struct are case sensitive,

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-14516) Clustering evaluator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16069815#comment-16069815 ] Marco Gaido edited comment on SPARK-14516 at 3/27/23 9:42 AM: -- Hello

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-14516) Clustering evaluator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17705265#comment-17705265 ] Marco Gaido commented on SPARK-14516: - As there are some issues with the Google Doc sharing, I

<    2   3   4   5   6   7