[jira] [Commented] (TEZ-3338) Support classloader isolation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15390219#comment-15390219 ] Sangjin Lee commented on TEZ-3338: -- bq. Other parts of the classpath would be user specific

[jira] [Commented] (TEZ-3338) Support classloader isolation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15386046#comment-15386046 ] Sangjin Lee commented on TEZ-3338: -- Thanks for the detailed explanation [~sseth]! Would it

[jira] [Commented] (TEZ-3338) Support classloader isolation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15384803#comment-15384803 ] Sangjin Lee commented on TEZ-3338: -- If we are going to have isolation between (tez + hadoop

[jira] [Commented] (TEZ-3338) Support classloader isolation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15380208#comment-15380208 ] Sangjin Lee commented on TEZ-3338: -- Thanks for the comment [~sseth]. In fact, the latter is

[jira] [Commented] (TEZ-3338) Support classloader isolation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15379611#comment-15379611 ] Sangjin Lee commented on TEZ-3338: -- One high level decision we need to make is this. Do you

[jira] [Commented] (TEZ-3299) Tez is incompatible with HADOOP_USE_CLIENT_CLASSLOADER=true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15378105#comment-15378105 ] Sangjin Lee commented on TEZ-3299: -- You can use exclusion to work around this issue perhaps