[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Peach updated TS-1043:
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1.2)
> PATCH: teach TSFetchUrl to use the content-length to find the after_body
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Peach updated TS-1045:
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1.2)
> PATCH: add new TSFetchHdrGet API
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leif Hedstrom updated TS-1102:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1.2)
3.1.3
> Cleanup obsolete debugging code
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Igor Galić updated TS-874:
--
Backport to Version: (was: 3.0.3)
> asf-dist should be git nice
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Igor Galić resolved TS-874.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0.3
I'm a maverick.
> asf-dist should be git nice
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Igor Galić reopened TS-874:
---
Backport to Version: 3.0.3
This should *really* be backported to 3.0.x because, you know, we want to
release.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Igor Galić reassigned TS-874:
-
Assignee: Igor Galić (was: Zhao Yongming)
> asf-dist should be git nice
> ---
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nick Kew resolved TS-1100.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Turns out this is indeed TS-948, and I was using the wrong symlink that caused
me to think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nick Kew closed TS-1100.
> Coredump at startup when there's a duplicate remap rule
> ---
>