[commit] isync_1_2_branch: fix configure for static libdb, libnsl, and libsocket

2015-07-22 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
commit 57a0920fcbfb9201f0b9e898d66c3232545aae23 Author: Oswald Buddenhagen Date: Sat Jul 18 18:17:07 2015 +0200 fix configure for static libdb, libnsl, and libsocket the right variable to put libraries into is LIBS, not LDFLAGS. REFMAIL: caabpu68s3uy0gv-vfagzenn0s5ow--+p+y

Re: Berkeley DB cannot be found on Ubuntu

2015-07-22 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 09:11:22AM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > that exposed this long-standing ordering problem. > a clarification here: the code in the bdb check is obviously completely new. but it's a copy-and-paste job from the ipv6 check, which exists since two years. --

Re: Berkeley DB cannot be found on Ubuntu

2015-07-22 Thread Reimar Döffinger
With my sincerest understanding for the frustrations of both sides, and effects of non-native language, but: Could we please not let the discussion slip down that road? I've seen it tried and tried it myself enough to be quite certain it never ends well. Thanks :) ---

Re: Berkeley DB cannot be found on Ubuntu

2015-07-22 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 08:58:07AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote: > But the BDB detection code in configure doesn't even use -ldb?? > I.e. it does not link at all to the library. > yes, there was a report about the test being a tad too optimistic a few weeks ago, so i made sure it actually tries to

Re: Berkeley DB cannot be found on Ubuntu

2015-07-22 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:13:53PM +, daniel szmulewicz wrote: > I'm sorry to disappoint, but there is no such thing as Daniel's > installation. It is a stock Ubuntu install, arguably the most common distro > in the world. And the same inability to detect Berkeley DB arose in both > 14.04 and 1