On Sun, Jun 12 2016, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> But I infer this is do-able, and something that would be mainlined?
>>
> yes. it's in the todo file. ;)
If this works like my TODO entries, it's dangerous ;)
--
What Net
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 06:31:01PM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12 2016, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:25:35PM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> >> Does isync currently [attempt to] detect messages which have been moved
> >> across folders, and propagate the change w
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 06:18:30PM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> I'd argue that when CertificateFile is specified, SystemCertificates
> should default to no.
>
makes sense.
--
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors
On Sun, Jun 12 2016, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:25:35PM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
>> Does isync currently [attempt to] detect messages which have been moved
>> across folders, and propagate the change with MOVE?
>>
> nope. patches welcome (i can give some direction if yo
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:25:35PM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> Does isync currently [attempt to] detect messages which have been moved
> across folders, and propagate the change with MOVE?
>
nope. patches welcome (i can give some direction if you're interested).
--
Some thoughts on CertificateFile.
I'd argue that when CertificateFile is specified, SystemCertificates
should default to no.
The reasoning is that when you use CertificateFile you probably want
certificate/key pinning, but this is not what happens. If
SystemCertificates is yes, your (self-signed)
Hi everyone,
I read in the archive some discussion about detecting moved messages
across folders, but that was a long time ago.
Does isync currently [attempt to] detect messages which have been moved
across folders, and propagate the change with MOVE? By looking at the
documentation I cannot find
