Re: Can the isync deprecation warning be disabled?

2021-03-21 Thread synflower--- via isync-devel
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 08:31:21PM +1300, Miles Rout via isync-devel wrote: However, since updating isync I have started receiving a deprecation warning about master/slave in favour of far/near. I would rather not go through all my configuration files on all my various machines just to change on

Re: Errors on second sync: Subfolders of INBOX apparently causing issues

2021-03-21 Thread Johannes Kastl
Hi all, On 21.03.21 12:36 Johannes Kastl wrote: > On 19.03.21 18:31 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 05:18:55PM +0100, Johannes Kastl wrote: >>>Can someone enlighten me where my error is? >>> >> you need to use uppercase INBOX/ for Path. > > Ah yes, thanks that did the trick.

Can the isync deprecation warning be disabled?

2021-03-21 Thread Miles Rout via isync-devel
I appreciate the work you have put into this project. It has been much more reliable than my old offlineimap setup. However, since updating isync I have started receiving a deprecation warning about master/slave in favour of far/near. I would rather not go through all my configuration files on a

Re: Can the isync deprecation warning be disabled?

2021-03-21 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 08:31:21PM +1300, Miles Rout wrote: I'd just prefer that I didn't have to go and edit dozens of files on a dozen different systems. didn't you just spend more time on writing that mail than fixing at least a dozen systems? if you're in the extraordinary situation of ac

Re: Errors on second sync: Subfolders of INBOX apparently causing issues

2021-03-21 Thread Johannes Kastl
On 19.03.21 18:31 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 05:18:55PM +0100, Johannes Kastl wrote: >>Can someone enlighten me where my error is? >> > you need to use uppercase INBOX/ for Path. Ah yes, thanks that did the trick. I was hoping it was something obvious... :-) > this is per