On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 01:56:51AM +0530, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:26:46PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > there is nothing wrong in that log - the error is within the message
> > from the cron job. you're being recursive. ^^
> >
> Oh! ye
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:26:46PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> there is nothing wrong in that log - the error is within the message
> from the cron job. you're being recursive. ^^
>
Oh! yes. I sent the wrong logs. But I am continuously getting errors
in the cron mail. Let me check for more
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 05:00:19PM +0530, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> I'll post in this thread again, with diagnostics using '-DN', if the
> problem re-occurs.
>
Again got the error. Attached file has the relevant part of log
messages. I have used '-DN' option. Is th
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 01:06:13PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 03:36:16PM +0530, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> > Socket error on imap.gmail.com (74.125.24.108:993): timeout.
> >
> that might be a case for strace.
> you may also try mbsync's -
Hi,
We had discussed this in another thread but I thought it deserves a
separate thread.
I am consistently getting this error in one of my channels; probably the
one which synchronizes my "sent" box with Gmail's Bin.
> Pankajs-MacBook-Pro% mbsync -a
> C: 4/12 B: 4/12 M: +0/0 *0/0 #0/0 S: +2/2
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:45:47AM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > Sync New ReNew Flags
> >
> ah, there: you're not syncing deletions. that explains why the conflict
> persists. i suppose it would make sense to simply suppress the message
> in this case, even though technically it *is* entire
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:12:58PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> yes, it should. but i seem to remember that someone pointed out that it
> doesn't happen in certain scenarios. are you running a full sync?
> what's your config+command line?
Below is my config. And I run the command `mbsync gma
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 04:46:48PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> this is not really an issue. it's just telling you that you modified the
> message in both stores in ways that cannot be reconciled (which means it
> drops the less interesting change, e.g., a flag update on one end when
> the me
Hi,
I have started using mutt again for reading emails. About 18 years back
I used to use mutt with fetchmail. But when I searched now, people have
reported that mbsync is much better to download emails locally. So I
have setup mbsync. I have yet to make it a service. I'll do it after a
couple of
