On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:45:47AM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > Sync New ReNew Flags
> >
> ah, there: you're not syncing deletions. that explains why the conflict
> persists. i suppose it would make sense to simply suppress the message
> in this case, even though technically it *is* entire
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:47:22AM +0530, Tejas Sanap wrote:
> I looked into my own mbsyncrc and found that even though I use Gmail too
> I haven't specified a port number. Maybe, try getting rid of it?
>
> > Port 993
> > SSLType IMAPS
>
the latter implies the former, so the setting is merely red
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 03:14:37AM +0530, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:12:58PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > yes, it should. but i seem to remember that someone pointed out that it
> > doesn't happen in certain scenarios. are you running a full sync?
> > what's your conf
Dear all,
I looked into my own mbsyncrc and found that even though I use Gmail too
I haven't specified a port number. Maybe, try getting rid of it?
> IMAPAccount gmail
> Host imap.gmail.com
> Port 993
> User pankaj.jan...@gmail.com
> Pass
> SSLType IMAPS
> SSLVersions TLSv1.2
> CertificateFile /U
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:12:58PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> yes, it should. but i seem to remember that someone pointed out that it
> doesn't happen in certain scenarios. are you running a full sync?
> what's your config+command line?
Below is my config. And I run the command `mbsync gma
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:31:39PM +0530, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> If 'mbsync' drops the less interesting change then shouldn't the
> problem get resolve automatically. This notice should not appear the
> next time I run 'mbsync'.
>
yes, it should. but i seem to remember that someone pointed out tha
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 04:46:48PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> this is not really an issue. it's just telling you that you modified the
> message in both stores in ways that cannot be reconciled (which means it
> drops the less interesting change, e.g., a flag update on one end when
> the me
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:25:48PM +0530, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> I am currently facing this issue:
>
> Notice: conflicting changes in (124660,81)
>
this is not really an issue. it's just telling you that you modified the
message in both stores in ways that cannot be reconciled (which means it
dro
Hi,
I have started using mutt again for reading emails. About 18 years back
I used to use mutt with fetchmail. But when I searched now, people have
reported that mbsync is much better to download emails locally. So I
have setup mbsync. I have yet to make it a service. I'll do it after a
couple of
