Hi!
Just wanted to update this thread to mention how much I've been enjoying
the new output from isync 1.5.1.
Thank you so much!
--
Akshay
___
isync-devel mailing list
isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/lis
On 2024-11-23 15:09 +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 06:26:06PM -0800, Akshay Hegde wrote:
> > Like most new UIs, my initial reaction was 'oh I don't like that', but
> > perhaps I just need to get used to it.
> >
> i thought that myself, but i'm at the poi
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 06:26:06PM -0800, Akshay Hegde wrote:
Like most new UIs, my initial reaction was 'oh I don't like that', but
perhaps I just need to get used to it.
i thought that myself, but i'm at the point where i've concluded that it
was simply a stupid idea.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at
(had to resend above message, accidentally replied directly to Daniel
instead of replying to the list, whoops, sorry!)
--
Akshay
___
isync-devel mailing list
isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync
On 2024-11-20 16:05 +0100, Daniel Tameling wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:24:09PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel
>wrote:
>>
>> now, i'll admit that i find the verbose summary hard to parse myself, as
>> the numbers get kind of lost between the words. i just didn't have a
>> better i
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 08:22:21PM -0800, Akshay Hegde via isync-devel wrote:
I updated to isync 1.5.0 recently and noticed that my console logs from
mbsync are now a more verbose, and to me personally-harder to read at
a glance:
Processed 40 box(es) in 1 channel(s),
pulled 0 new message(s
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:24:09PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel
wrote:
>
> now, i'll admit that i find the verbose summary hard to parse myself, as
> the numbers get kind of lost between the words. i just didn't have a
> better idea ...
>
I think it would help to put all numbers at
On 2024-11-19 12:24 +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel wrote:
> pedantically, that's progress info (which you still see during
> operation), and it looks a bit stupid as a summary, because every number
> appears twice.
>
> now, i'll admit that i find the verbose summary hard to parse myself
Hello!
First of all, thank you so much for isync; I've used it for over a year
now and I have nothing but good things to say about it.
I updated to isync 1.5.0 recently and noticed that my console logs from
mbsync are now a more verbose, and to me personally-harder to read at
a glance:
Proce