On 15/06/2012 7:25, Hemant Sharma wrote:
> Can I continue using this ver 4.1.6 even now when the latest version
> is a paid version?
There has never been a version 4.1.6 of iText, the Java-PDF version.
We've discussed this over and over again: you shouldn't use old versions
of iText for technica
Hi ,
I am trying to use iText version4.1.6 with one of my commercial product as
I read on some blogs etc that this was under LGPL .
Can I continue using this ver 4.1.6 even now when the latest version is a
paid version?
Please advise. Thank you.
Regards,
Hemant
--
There are SO MANY questions to be asked before anyone can give you a
recommendation.
Do you want the notes/comments stored in the PDF itself or kept separate
in the database?
Are the PDFs being viewed in a browser or stand-alone (or other)?
What version of Adobe Reader is being used?
Is this all c
The fix is done in the SVN trunk. Please check that it works.
Paulo
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Andreas Kuehne wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> impressive! I wouldn't track this down!
>
> Anyway I don't like *Buffer classes and would have created a plain
> String and converted it to a byte array la
Can itext flatten transparencies for printing ?
--
*__*
*Keith A Stiller | Research Engineer *
* RR Donnelley Research & Development*
*300 Lang Blvd. | Grand Island, NY 14072 *
D:716-564-8220 | M: 716-481-9930 | F: 716-564-8201
Email: keith.stil...@rrd.com
Roberto, Andreas,
this indeed is a bug in iText.
Everything in the signing process is done correctly, merely the
serialization of the signed byte range into the resulting PDF is somewhat
inaccurate.
PdfSignatureAppearance.preClose(HashMap) creates the byte sequence
representing the signed ranges
