On 2/5/2015 17:59 PM, mkl wrote:
> "just" in this case is merely more than a year ago...
And the situation that is described, where the customer stopped working
with the integrator, was a situation where the integrator had introduced
the AGPL version of iText in a situation that either required h
codemeister2 wrote
> What you just described is called tortious interference or interference
> with contractual relations...
"just" in this case is merely more than a year ago...
--
View this message in context:
http://itext-general.2136553.n4.nabble.com/Use-of-iTextSharp-dll-4-1-6-tp4659543p
On 2/5/2015 17:02 PM, codemeister2 wrote:
> What you just described is called tortious interference or interference with
> contractual relations. Calling up someone's client and telling them their
> integrator did something wrong or bad by using the older, more liberally
> licensed version of iText
What you just described is called tortious interference or interference with
contractual relations. Calling up someone's client and telling them their
integrator did something wrong or bad by using the older, more liberally
licensed version of iTextSharp can constitute civil malfeasance under the
l
