While you may not "win the argument", I have made notes to myself to improve
the text for the next version of ISO 32000. So your comments about
improvements are DEFINITELY welcome...but, yes, that doesn't change
implementation.
Leonard
On 9/6/09 11:49 PM, "Tony Stevens" wrote:
>
Leonard Ro
Leonard Rosenthol-3 wrote:
>
>> According to section 12.5.2 of the PDF specification, this is used to
>> determine the visibility of the annotation, and "...If it is determined
>> to
>> be invisible, the annotation shall be skipped, as if it were not in the
>> document." (my emphasis).
>>
>
On 9/6/09 12:39 AM, "Tony Stevens" wrote:
>> That is correct. Remember that it is optional CONTENT - not optional
>> ANNOTATIONS! So via OCGs, you can only "turn off" content. If you wish
>> to
>> also hide the annotation itself - then you need to use JavaScript
>> (annot.hide(), I believe)
Leonard Rosenthol-3 wrote:
>
> On 9/5/09 11:05 AM, "Tony Stevens" wrote:
>> I'm doing some experiments to see what I can achieve with PDF optional
>> content, and I'm confused with what's happening when I add an annotation
>> in
>> a specific layer. In the PDF below, page 1 layer 2 has a link (
On 9/5/09 11:05 AM, "Tony Stevens" wrote:
> I'm doing some experiments to see what I can achieve with PDF optional
> content, and I'm confused with what's happening when I add an annotation in
> a specific layer. In the PDF below, page 1 layer 2 has a link (the red X) to
> show the alternate versi
I'm doing some experiments to see what I can achieve with PDF optional
content, and I'm confused with what's happening when I add an annotation in
a specific layer. In the PDF below, page 1 layer 2 has a link (the red X) to
show the alternate version of the page in layer 1. This works, but when
la
