Alexander,
Alexander Raitskin wrote
> I've added these lines to the code: [...]
>
> Now it seems that the message digest is in the signed attributes too.
> However, the file is still does not pass the validation of Foxit...
As Paulo has initially suggested, you now should really forward this iss
12 PM
To: itext-questions@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [iText-questions] Digital sigantures generated with itext are not
valid in Foxit
Paulo, Dániel, Raitskin, Paulo Soares-3 wrote > If iText is producing damaged
PDFs please tell where. As far as we know > there are no issues here. You
should real
Paulo Soares-3 wrote
> Unless Foxit fixes it, they will have to complain to Microsoft.
Well, at least they should say what they require in a CMS signature
container to accept it. If they indeed require the ESS
signing-vertificate[-v2] for security and stated that in a verification
failure message
Yes, but that's VERY different than saying a signed PDF is not signed (or
vice versa).
Leonard
On 1/16/12 2:10 AM, "Dániel Kékesi" wrote:
>But we also know that Adobe Reader is quite forgiving regarding
>off-spec/damaged PDFs.
>
>Daniel
>
>On 2012.01.16. 11:07, Paulo Soares wrote:
>> You'll hav
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [iText-questions] Digital sigantures generated with itext are not
valid in Foxit
Raitskin, Paulo,
first I have to revise my former words:
mkl wrote
> Its single SignerInfo (see below) does not contain any attributes, neither
> signed nor unsigne
Raitskin, Paulo,
first I have to revise my former words:
mkl wrote
> Its single SignerInfo (see below) does not contain any attributes, neither
> signed nor unsigned ones, especially not a MessageDigest. For a
> "adbe.pkcs7.detached" kind of signature this to me seems wrong. As a
> signature of t
itext-questions@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [iText-questions] Digital sigantures generated with itext are not
valid in Foxit
Paulo, Dániel, Raitskin, Paulo Soares-3 wrote > If iText is producing damaged
PDFs please tell where. As far as we know > there are no issues here. You
sh
Paulo, Dániel, Raitskin,
Paulo Soares-3 wrote
> If iText is producing damaged PDFs please tell where. As far as we know
> there are no issues here. You should really take to problem to the Foxit
> team, it's their application that is complaining, they should know why.
Yes, it's Foxit that is comp
I didn't say that it was iText's fault to produce a bad PDF (IF - and it's a
BIG IF - it is indeed a bad PDF), but it might be due to the implementation of
iText in this specific task (iText is just a tool, and like any tool it can be
used to create a masterpiece or garbage). Maybe the PDF was n
o:dan...@kekesi.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 10:11 AM
To: Post all your questions about iText here
Subject: Re: [iText-questions] Digital sigantures generated with itext are not
valid in Foxit
But we also know that Adobe Reader is quite forgiving regarding
off-spec/damaged PDFs.
Daniel
On 2012.01.1
But we also know that Adobe Reader is quite forgiving regarding
off-spec/damaged PDFs.
Daniel
On 2012.01.16. 11:07, Paulo Soares wrote:
> You'll have to take the problem to Foxit. It works correctly with Acrobat,
> doesn't it?
> Paulo
>
--
s] Digital sigantures generated with itext are not
valid in Foxit
Hello,
I tried two methods to sign on a PDF file with itext:
This one uses .NET CmsSigner:
http://itextpdf.sourceforge.net/howtosign.html#signtsocspcs
I've signed a simple file this way and I got this:
http://www.darina.u
Hello,
I tried two methods to sign on a PDF file with itext:
This one uses .NET CmsSigner:
http://itextpdf.sourceforge.net/howtosign.html#signtsocspcs
I've signed a simple file this way and I got this:
http://www.darina.us/code/uploader/adobe.pdf
And this uses java keystore:
http://itextpd
13 matches
Mail list logo
