Am 09.10.2010 12:07, schrieb Bruno Lowagie:
Hi, everybody,
first let me please say, that I am one of those lurkers too, who got
some nice ideas from the questions answered so bravely before.
This is the reason why I wnat to see this list living a long time. ;-)
> Correct. In theory, the archi
On 9/10/2010 11:47, John Renfrew wrote:
> An archive part of a forum would be good as there is no way to check the
> answers you have already a patiently given,
Correct. In theory, the archives are "searchable."
In practice, searching the archives is a pain.
Even when I know what I'm looking for
Quick thought
You can check people have the book by asking for a word on a page as a
condition of application.
Obviously chosen randomly form a list of them to stop someone just posting
the answer somewhere...
Happens with books that have web-content to support the examples i.e.
Peachpit.
Maybe
