[iText-questions] PAdES-LTV specific verification

2012-01-10 Thread aszomor
Dear Team, Is there a deadline for the task, can someone inform when expected ? Thanks, Attila. -- Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existin

[iText-questions] PAdES-LTV example and smartcard signature with timestamp example in C#

2011-12-01 Thread Paulo Soares
I've prepared a PAdES-LTV example for Java and C#. In addition I've extended the smartcard signature example with C# to include a timestamp.You can find all this at http://itextpdf.sourceforge.net/howtosign.html. Paulo--

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-11-22 Thread mkl
Leonard, Leonard Rosenthol-3 wrote > The spec is correct as is our (and iText's) implementation. > > A time-stamp signature is the new RFC3161 subfilter mentioned below. I > think the wording here got cleaned up in 32K-2. That makes me once again more expectant for the eventual publication ther

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-11-22 Thread Leonard Rosenthol
The spec is correct as is our (and iText's) implementation. A time-stamp signature is the new RFC3161 subfilter mentioned below. I think the wording here got cleaned up in 32K-2. Leonard On 11/22/11 4:59 AM, "mkl" wrote: >Paulo, Leonard, > >another question I stumbled upon while taking a look

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-11-22 Thread mkl
Paulo Soares-3 wrote > That's the way Acrobat X does it, the full Contents entry for signatures > but just the actual timestamp for subfilter ETSI.RFC3161. I was puzzled by > the spec wording but, as usual, "do as Acrobat does". Ok, who wants to question that reference? -- View this message in

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-11-22 Thread Paulo Soares
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 9:59 AM To: itext-questions@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation Paulo, Leonard, another question I stumbled upon while taking a look at the iText Ltv* classes... In LtvVerification.getSignatureHashKey(String) the code gene

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-11-22 Thread mkl
Paulo, Leonard, another question I stumbled upon while taking a look at the iText Ltv* classes... In LtvVerification.getSignatureHashKey(String) the code generally takes the complete decoded Contents entry to calculate the hash from, in case of document time stamps (subfilter ETSI.RFC3161), thoug

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-11-22 Thread Paulo Soares
Thank you, I'll look into it. Paulo -Original Message- From: mkl [mailto:m...@wir-sind-cool.org] Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 3:55 PM To: itext-questions@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation Paulo, Paulo Soares-3 wrote > The wor

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-11-21 Thread mkl
Paulo, Paulo Soares-3 wrote > The work is not finished yet, I'm generating all the data but it's not > going yet to the /DSS dictionary and there will also be the problem of > updating an existing /DSS. The provenance of OCSP and CRL (the CRL could > come from some cache, for example) is another i

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-10-18 Thread Paulo Soares
ists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation Paulo, Paulo Soares-3 wrote: > Today I'll commit code for the timestamp and the rest until the end of the > week. As the rest has now been committed, I just took a glance at it... some C#ishness in it... ;) L

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-10-17 Thread mkl
Paulo, Paulo Soares-3 wrote: > Today I'll commit code for the timestamp and the rest until the end of the > week. As the rest has now been committed, I just took a glance at it... some C#ishness in it... ;) Looks simple enough for easy use. But is there a reason why only OCSP responses or CRLs f

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-10-11 Thread mkl
Paulo, Paulo Soares-3 wrote: > The LTV implementation is finished but I'm still deciding on what the > user interface will be in the DSS case. Today I'll commit code for the > timestamp and the rest until the end of the week. I'm looking forward to seeing it! > About the "ETSI PAdES Remote I

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-10-11 Thread Paulo Soares
resting but the real boss here is Acrobat and if it works there the test is done. My opinion, Bruno may think differently. Paulo -Original Message- From: mkl [mailto:m...@wir-sind-cool.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 9:24 AM To: itext-questions@lists.sourceforge.net Subject:

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-10-04 Thread mkl
Paulo, on the topic of "PAdES-LTV implementation"... Paulo Soares-3 wrote: > Don't bother with it, it's being developed and will be available this > month [September] in iText. Will this implementation be available early enough for integration to be used in the "ETSI PAdES Remote Interop Event -

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-09-06 Thread Paulo Soares
-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation Oh, that's a great news (and a big surprise), you just made my day. Is there anywhere any information on the scope iText will support ? Thank you, Alexandre 2011/9/6 Paulo Soares mailto:psoa...@glintt.com>> Don't bother with it, it's being

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-09-06 Thread Alex B
> in iText. > > Paulo > > -- > *From:* Alex B [mailto:lxndr...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:21 AM > *To:* itext-questions@lists.sourceforge.net > *Subject:* [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation > > Hi all, > >

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-09-06 Thread Paulo Soares
Don't bother with it, it's being developed and will be available this month in iText. Paulo From: Alex B [mailto:lxndr...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:21 AM To: itext-questions@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [iText-questions]

[iText-questions] PAdES-LTV implementation

2011-09-06 Thread Alex B
Hi all, I am new to itext, currently trying to implement PAdES-LTV using it (and understanding how it works). I read old posts on this implementation, seeing that it would be necessary to modify itext's core. If this implementation still needs to modify iText's core, is it possible to have some

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV

2010-02-26 Thread Albert Ciffone
lto:albert.ciff...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, February 25, 2010 11:41 AM > *To:* Post all your questions about iText here; Leonard Rosenthol > *Subject:* Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV > > > > Hi Leonard, > > > > I create the DSS structure correctly, and acrobat

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV

2010-02-25 Thread Leonard Rosenthol
Ciffone [mailto:albert.ciff...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 11:41 AM To: Post all your questions about iText here; Leonard Rosenthol Subject: Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV Hi Leonard, I create the DSS structure correctly, and acrobat recognize this part. I have the problem when

Re: [iText-questions] PAdES-LTV

2010-02-24 Thread Leonard Rosenthol
iText-questions] PAdES-LTV Hi, I'm trying to make a PAdES-LTV with iText but I'm not sure that the generated timeStamp which signs the whole document (first revision with original signature and DSS structure which contains certificate and revocation data) is correct because adobe can't

[iText-questions] PAdES-LTV

2010-02-24 Thread Albert Ciffone
Hi, I'm trying to make a PAdES-LTV with iText but I'm not sure that the generated timeStamp which signs the whole document (first revision with original signature and DSS structure which contains certificate and revocation data) is correct because adobe can't recognize it. To do this timeStamp i'm