alex writes:
> I think however it would require a significant
> software change which I am not qualified to estimate. Those more familiar
> with the FOP source code can evaluate that.
I am now working on 'Styles' and 'default fonts', so that you
can tell some iText object 'please apply this st
At 14:27 12/03/02, Keiron Liddle wrote:
> > FOP behaves exactly the same but instead of having its own pdf
> generation code then iText is
> used as a library to generate pdf.
I agree that if anything iText could be considered as a "plugin" for PDF
generation and FOP as an XSL:FO processor whi
Keiron Liddle writes:
>
> That sounds like a good suggestion.
>
> To start with I think we should consider only this:
> FOP behaves exactly the same but instead of having its own pdf generation
> code then iText is used as a library to generate pdf.
>
> So the questions are:
> - is the lice
That sounds like a good suggestion.
To start with I think we should consider only this:
FOP behaves exactly the same but instead of having its own pdf generation
code then iText is used as a library to generate pdf.
So the questions are:
- is the license useable
- is the api sufficient for FOP
D]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [iText-questions] Re: merging two libraries
Hi,
From the archives it appears that the discussion on the fop-dev list was
about 2 years ago (no apparent refusal though). It is certainly time to
revisit.
From the small amount of information I
different
approaches to PDF generation without much contact points.
Best Regards,
Paulo Soares
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:18
> To: Keiron Liddle
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
Keiron Liddle writes:
> Hi,
>
> From the archives it appears that the discussion on the fop-dev list was
> about 2 years ago (no apparent refusal though).
Is it really that long ago?
> It is certainly time to revisit.
>
> From the small amount of information I know about iText it would app
Hi,
From the archives it appears that the discussion on the fop-dev list was
about 2 years ago (no apparent refusal though). It is certainly time to
revisit.
From the small amount of information I know about iText it would appear
to be a more advanced pdf library.
I don't know what the lice
