rumen varbanov wrote:
> To Bruno & Chris
> Thank you!
>
> We have an old java application, that uses XSL FO,
> Probably is now better to use iText XML to PDF
No, that's not better.
The XML parsing functionality in iText is also very old,
the XML examples that are used throughout the book will
giv
To Bruno & Chris
Thank you!
We have an old java application, that uses XSL FO,
Probably is now better to use iText XML to PDF
(
Pablos e-Mail:
Paulo Soares
Wed, 25 May 2005 03:29:24 -0700
http://www.lowagie.com/iText/tutorial/ch07.html
)
br
rumen
Bruno Lowagie schrieb:
rumen varbanov wrote
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:58:43 +0100
> From: rumen varbanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [iText-questions] XSL:FO PDF Generation
> To: iText-questions@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset
rumen varbanov wrote:
> Hi,
> Can iText works with XSL:FO input?
No, you need Apache FOP for that.
Nevertheless, iText can be used as post-processor
for PDF output produced by Apache FOP.
I wouldn't advice you to go down the path of XSL:FO.
You should only use it, if you're already using
XSL:FO i
Hi,
Can iText works with XSL:FO input?
Best regards!
rumen
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics t
