Op 7/12/2011 9:25, mkl schreef:
> Well, of course, I'll confirm that, but would your customer be impressed by
> my word?;)
My idea of respect is that you should always tell the truth (and
apologize if you made a mistake, because I make mistakes too). Some
people don't agree: they won't take no f
Bruno,
1T3XT BVBA wrote
> If you open the signature panel in these PDFs, select "View Signed
> version" and click "View Report", you get a Report code 4000 saying
> "Unrecognized PDF content: The document contains PDF content or custom
> content not supported by the current version of Adobe Reader
Dear Michael
Thank you very much for your answer. This is what exactly I was asking. I
saw the support for LtvVerification and LtvTimestamp in the iText sample
done by Paulo and I was asking if this support was also included in
iTextSharp and you answered me.
Best regards
Manuel
--
View this mes
Paulo,
Paulo Soares-3 wrote
> Please remind me of the pending issues of the iText PAdES-LTV
> implementation. I would like to close it on the signing side. Signature
> validation will come after.
I'm not aware of any specific issues still pending; the OCSPResponse <->
BasicOCSPResponse issue in 5
: itext-questions@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [iText-questions] iTextSharp 5.1.3 and XMLWorker 1.1.1 (.NET)
released
Manuel,
mpino wrote
> Does iTextSharp 5.1.3 support PAdES-Ltv?
What do you mean by that?
Obviously there is some support for PAdES-LTV in iText (and, thus, most
likely
Manuel,
mpino wrote
> Does iTextSharp 5.1.3 support PAdES-Ltv?
What do you mean by that?
Obviously there is some support for PAdES-LTV in iText (and, thus, most
likely in iTextSharp, too) as there are classes LtvVerification (JavaDoc
comment: "Add verification according to PAdES-LTV (part 4)") a
Dear Paulo
First of all, thank you for your excellent work and for sharing with us. Now
my question. Does iTextSharp 5.1.3 support PAdES-Ltv?
Thanks in advance
Best regards
Manuel
--
View this message in context:
http://itext-general.2136553.n4.nabble.com/iTextSharp-5-1-3-and-XMLWorker-1-1-1-NE
It is really laborious to test such kind of hug dinosaur documents :)
WMJ
>
> From: Paulo Soares
>Subject: Re: [iText-questions] iTextSharp 5.1.3 and XMLWorker 1.1.1 (.NET)
>released
>
>
>
>If the file has compressed object stre
] iTextSharp 5.1.3 and XMLWorker 1.1.1 (.NET)
released
Oh, I see.
Thank you for working on this.
Could you please point out whether the bug will seriously destroy a PDF file?
WMJ
From: Paulo Soares
Subject: Re: [iText-questions] iTextSharp 5.1.3 and XMLWorker
Oh, I see.
Thank you for working on this.
Could you please point out whether the bug will seriously destroy a PDF file?
WMJ
>
> From: Paulo Soares
>Subject: Re: [iText-questions] iTextSharp 5.1.3 and XMLWorker 1.1.1 (.NET)
>released
>
>
your questions about iText here
Subject: Re: [iText-questions] iTextSharp 5.1.3 and XMLWorker 1.1.1 (.NET)
released
It seems that the very large PDF document support is not yet integrated in
5.1.3 release.
Nice!
On 1/12/2011 14:31, Paulo Soares wrote:
iTextSharp
It seems that the very large PDF document support is not yet integrated in
5.1.3 release.
>
> Nice!
>
>On 1/12/2011 14:31, Paulo Soares wrote:
>iTextSharp 5.1.3 and XMLWorker 1.1.1 (.NET) were released today. iTextSharp
>5.1.3 had a wrong assembly number and y
Nice!
On 1/12/2011 14:31, Paulo Soares wrote:
iTextSharp 5.1.3 and XMLWorker 1.1.1 (.NET) were released today.
iTextSharp 5.1.3 had a wrong assembly number and you may need to
download it again. XMLWorker 1.1.1 has all the fixes up to today.
Let's hope I did not break anything with the fix
iTextSharp 5.1.3 and XMLWorker 1.1.1 (.NET) were released today. iTextSharp
5.1.3 had a wrong assembly number and you may need to download it again.
XMLWorker 1.1.1 has all the fixes up to today.
Paulo
--
All the data co
14 matches
Mail list logo
