[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I asked, a few days ago:
>> Any plans to actually submit the ivtv driver for inclusion into the
>> main kernel tree?
>>
> ... no answer? IMHO that would make sense -- the kernel people would at
> least fix the incompatibilities they're introducing themselves.
>
Kernel inclusion is the goal.
The individual major releases (0.4, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8) are for specific
kernel versions because more parts of ivtv have been merged into the
kernel in each release.
http://ivtvdriver.org/trac/roadmap
- Rick
On Nov 12, 2006, at 8:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> H
Hi,
I asked, a few days ago:
>
> Any plans to actually submit the ivtv driver for inclusion into the
> main kernel tree?
>
... no answer? IMHO that would make sense -- the kernel people would at
least fix the incompatibilities they're introducing themselves.
Plus, the driver might actually ben
Hi,
Nick Fearnley (Digital Media Projects Ltd.):
> Hi, is it possible to build the ivtv driver into the kernel itself
> rather than having it as a module?
>
That would require the driver to be a part of the kernel.
... which is something I've meant to ask anyway, so here goes:
Any plans to actu
Hi, is it possible to build the ivtv driver into the kernel
itself rather than having it as a module?
Regards
Nick
___
ivtv-devel mailing list
ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
