Re: [ivtv-devel] [PATCH] VBLANK adjustment

2005-05-27 Thread William Powers
For grins, I expanded on the same theme to set the values for 0x474, 0x475, 0x476, and 0x477 to the defaults listed in the datasheet appropriate for the required video mode. I did this against an old version of the driver, so there's no sense patchifying it, but this is what it looks like: i

[ivtv-devel] #0.3.5l force input init each capture start, even upon vbi/mpeg

2005-05-27 Thread Chris Kennedy
This allows one to force input init of the pvr150/500 digitizer,and does so each capture right before start capture, even if it isn't the first and only capture running, so when running vbi for instance long-term and start/stop mpeg captures, this will re-initialize the input each time. Also con

[ivtv-devel] PVR 350, 150(non-mce) dual system - 1 works, not both

2005-05-27 Thread Kevin Weiler
Greetings, I'm trying to get a dual-tuner system going. Everything works if I have either the PVR 350 or the 150 in the box by themselves. But if I put in the second card, the 350 works fine and the 150 appears to be recognized by ivtv, but captures from it are empty files. The 350 is recogni

Re: [ivtv-devel] #0.3.4u vbi insertion and display improvements

2005-05-27 Thread Chris Kennedy
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:36:05PM +0200, Martin Barnasconi wrote: > > Thanks for the info. Unfortunately, I'm currently running a much > > earlier version of ivtv (0.19, I think). Correct me if I'm wrong, but > > I don't think that that version embeds CC info. > > Guess not... > > > Maybe this i

Re: [ivtv-devel] #0.3.4u vbi insertion and display improvements

2005-05-27 Thread Martin Barnasconi
> Thanks for the info. Unfortunately, I'm currently running a much > earlier version of ivtv (0.19, I think). Correct me if I'm wrong, but > I don't think that that version embeds CC info. Guess not... > Maybe this is a naive question, but is the CC data that is gathered by > ivtv just plain text

Re: [ivtv-devel] #0.3.5h fixes for pvr350/500/150 conflicts

2005-05-27 Thread Larry Symms
For what it's worth I didn't have any audio issues in 0.3.5h but that's most likely because I'm not using tda9887. My guess is there's some signal crossing between the radio and tv tuners. I'll try enabling tda9887 when I get back from vacation on the 7th and I'll let you know if I have the s

Re: [ivtv-devel] #0.3.5h fixes for pvr350/500/150 conflicts

2005-05-27 Thread Nick Rosier
Just tried 0.3.5k. So far no DMA errors. To get audio I need to add qss=0 to the tda9887 options. Audio quality depends on the channel and ranges from pretty good, to acceptable (light crackling, ticks) to bad (constant humming). On YUV-playback I get these: ivtv: pci_map_sg dma->page_count 154 dm

Re: [ivtv-devel] Juicing brightness and enable peak on capture?

2005-05-27 Thread Tyler Trafford
Bryan Mayland wrote: > Before that I don't see any occurance of anything similar. I'd like to > thank whoever it is that has the SVN repository, without which this > would have been a pain to track. That you Tyler Trafford? Yeah, that's mine (assuming you mean the one at relyt.dyndns.org). I f

Re: [ivtv-devel] [PATCH] more cx25840 cleanup

2005-05-27 Thread Allan Stirling
Chris Kennedy wrote: Yeah, that is strange, I was wondering how it fixed it too, maybe the chip just saw the video re-init and does something about audio automatically? I'll know within a day or so if it really fixed it, I'll look at the audio re-init too, sounds interesting to do that too. Tha

[ivtv-devel] PVR150 and Recent 0.3.5j

2005-05-27 Thread Andrew Ziobro
I am using PVR-150 with Mythtv. with version 0.3.5j Tuner 0 works great. Svideo input 0 has strange ghost images in it. Svideo input 1 has strange ghost images and no color. Both seem to use the same audio. with version 0.3.5f Svideo 0 and 1 video are great , but Audio studders bad. Any advise?

[ivtv-devel] #0.3.5k patches and re-init audio/video/vbi/norm each capture

2005-05-27 Thread Chris Kennedy
This adds Tylers patches and also does a re-init on the cx25840 for not only the input for video but also the norm/audio and vbi now. #0.3.5k: http://www.ivtv.tv/releases/ivtv-0.3/ Thanks, Chris -- --- Chris Kennedy / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineer KMOS-TV/KTBG-FM Broadcasting Services Departm

Re: [ivtv-devel] [PATCH] more cx25840 cleanup

2005-05-27 Thread Chris Kennedy
Yeah, that is strange, I was wondering how it fixed it too, maybe the chip just saw the video re-init and does something about audio automatically? I'll know within a day or so if it really fixed it, I'll look at the audio re-init too, sounds interesting to do that too. Thanks, Chris On Fri, May 2

Re: [ivtv-devel] [PATCH] more cx25840 cleanup

2005-05-27 Thread Tyler Trafford
Oh, I forgot to mention that I made SET_NORM check to see if it was already set, and not do anything if it was... i can't see how that could break what you did, though. Your force of state->input should still make the input reinitialize correctly. You may want to reinit the audio_input too though

Re: [ivtv-devel] [PATCH] more cx25840 cleanup

2005-05-27 Thread Chris Kennedy
Actually one problem I see with this patch, and it's a recent change which I'm still trying to figure out the reasons for needing. There seems to be a problem running the pvr500/150 over extended periods of time for audio, will just stop working eventually, after a day or so. It seems that if you

[ivtv-devel] cx88 ivtv and bttv

2005-05-27 Thread Edward Brookhouse
Hi all, I'm working on getting a PVR250 setup - I'm running into a situation where if I compile a new kernel to get working cx88 drivers, my bttv stops working - Using FC3 on a custombuilt 2.6.11 kernel - After kernel compile, the cx driver loads but bttv fails - If I grab the source for video4

[ivtv-devel] [PATCH] more cx25840 cleanup

2005-05-27 Thread Tyler Trafford
Straight forward patch, does the following: * During initialization, instead of iteratively copying the array values for cx25840_input_layout, just the set a pointer to the proper array. * In DECODER_SET_INPUT, assign state->input after performing operation successfully. Also tried to make debug

[ivtv-devel] 0.3.5f not working for me (PVR 350/PAL)

2005-05-27 Thread jerome lacoste
Long time user of 0.3.2l driver, I've tried a (too big?) jump to 0.3.5f on my mythtv box. This didn't work out. Image was pausing for long times and getting delayed (like taking 1s to display 10s), sound holes, etc... I will try again with random versions in between and/or update with newer relea

Re: [ivtv-devel] #0.3.5j s-vid patch, fixes from Bryan Mayland, re-init cx25840 input

2005-05-27 Thread Allan Stirling
William Powers wrote: I have gained a greater understanding of the audio problem in versions since (at least) 0.3.4p, referred to here: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ivtv/devel/20342?#20342 and here: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ivtv/devel/20678?#20678 The audio recording f

Re: [ivtv-devel] #0.3.5h fixes for pvr350/500/150 conflicts

2005-05-27 Thread Larry Symms
Nick, Are you still getting these? Nick Rosier wrote: Chris, drivers seem to be getting worse for me. The best for me so far is still 0.3.4s. Problems I encounter with this one: - no audio on my 150MCE (PAL, tuner 58), started with 0.3.4w - live-tv in myth hangs after a couple of seconds, I

Re: [ivtv-devel] WinTV PVR 250 not doing anything

2005-05-27 Thread Nick Rosier
What are your module-options? Make sure you don't have duplicate modules (like tuner, tveeprom). N. On 5/27/05, Marcel Pol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hello, > Some time ago I bought an ivtv based card, but couldn't get it to work. > Now I'

[ivtv-devel] WinTV PVR 250 not doing anything

2005-05-27 Thread Marcel Pol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Some time ago I bought an ivtv based card, but couldn't get it to work. Now I'm willing to put in some time, and see if I can get it to work. Problem is, it's not doing anything, no video or audio, it's just dead as a rock. I have pasted the d

Re: [ivtv-devel] #0.3.5j s-vid patch, fixes from Bryan Mayland, re-init cx25840 input

2005-05-27 Thread Tyler Trafford
On 5/27/05, William Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have gained a greater understanding of the audio problem in versions > since (at least) 0.3.4p, referred to here: > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ivtv/devel/20342?#20342 > > and here: > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iv

Re: [ivtv-devel] #0.3.5j s-vid patch, fixes from Bryan Mayland, re-init cx25840 input

2005-05-27 Thread William Powers
I have gained a greater understanding of the audio problem in versions since (at least) 0.3.4p, referred to here: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ivtv/devel/20342?#20342 and here: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ivtv/devel/20678?#20678 The audio recording from a PVR-500 is being s

[ivtv-devel] [PATCH] ivtvctl usage alphabetization, standard ioctl output

2005-05-27 Thread Bryan Mayland
I'm resending this gzipped since my patch was 28k and the list max is 20k. Sorry about that! This patch is just some silly stuff. I've reordered the usage() output so it is in alphabetic order by short option letter (I put the uppercase before the lowercase when equal so they follow a get/set

[ivtv-devel] #0.3.5j s-vid patch, fixes from Bryan Mayland, re-init cx25840 input

2005-05-27 Thread Chris Kennedy
This addes the s-video patch from Tyler, will re-init the cx25840 input upon each capture and thanks to Bryan Mayland actually properly turns the digitzer on/off again. #0.3.5j: http://www.ivtv.tv/releases/ivtv-0.3/ Thanks, Chris -- --- Chris Kennedy / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineer KMOS-TV/KT

Re: [ivtv-devel] Card left in SOFT_RESET 0.3.5j

2005-05-27 Thread Chris Kennedy
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 08:26:41AM -0400, Bryan Mayland wrote: > In the 0.3.5j patch this morning, the DECODER_ENABLE_OUTPUT ioctl has > two CX25840_SET_SOFT_RESET(0x0001) calls and none that turn it off, > leaving the card in soft reset at the exit of the function. Is that > intentional? Ah,

[ivtv-devel] Card left in SOFT_RESET 0.3.5j

2005-05-27 Thread Bryan Mayland
In the 0.3.5j patch this morning, the DECODER_ENABLE_OUTPUT ioctl has two CX25840_SET_SOFT_RESET(0x0001) calls and none that turn it off, leaving the card in soft reset at the exit of the function. Is that intentional? Also, did you see my post yesterday about what are those cx25840_write()