[ivtv-devel] PVR150 remote problems

2005-09-17 Thread Andrew Saunders
I have been using a PVR350 for the past 3 months or so and everything worked great. I had to give it back so I ran out yesterday and bought a PVR150 (since I use a video card for output to TV anyway). Everything appears to start properly. ivtv: START INIT IVTV ==

Re: [ivtv-devel] PG600/Diamond PVR550 owners: please test

2005-09-17 Thread Robert Kohler
I doubled checked everything using the SVN 2686 without any personal patches on my PVR550. Everything works great. S-video input, sound via Composite. Video and Sound works. Tuner input. Video and Sound works. Composite input. Video and Sound works. All looks good. Hopefully the fix didn't

Re: [ivtv-devel] Recording problems with 0.3.8 (lenghty description)

2005-09-17 Thread kevin thayer
the drops occur in the mpeg file, since i see them on both of my frontends, one a pvr350 and one my laptop with mythfrontend also the drops are occurring on both boxes. the ivtv versions are: 3.5n (dual 250s) and 3.8 (no svn revision) (single 350) -tmk --- Hans Verkuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [ivtv-devel] [SOUND]: please try this patch

2005-09-17 Thread Philip Rowlands
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Hans Verkuil wrote: >I've made some fairly extensive I2C logs under Windows and I'm comparing them >with the linux I2C settings. I noticed that the wm8775 settings are >substantially different under Windows. This patch syncs them with the Windows >settings. I was puzzled by t

Re: [ivtv-devel] Recording problems with 0.3.8 (lenghty description)

2005-09-17 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Saturday 17 September 2005 18:38, kevin thayer wrote: > sure, i'll do some testing. > > Also, it should be noted that i have a 350 in one box, > and two 250's in another. I'm not sure which box is > the source of the trouble, and i'm not running 3.8 on > the box with the 250s. > > I'll keep you

Re: [ivtv-devel] KM400 & PVR 500 MCE == complete freeze?

2005-09-17 Thread James Sheridan
Does your PVR-500MCE sit in a PCI-X slot? There's a known issue with that configuration that Hauppauge says is "being investigated" by their engineers. Don't know if that relates, but that problem bit me hard. 250 worked like a champ, 500 crashed and burned. -- James ---

Re: [ivtv-devel] KM400 & PVR 500 MCE == complete freeze?

2005-09-17 Thread Philip Rowlands
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Jelle Kalf wrote: >I've turned on that magic sysrq in the kernel, recompiled and tried to >see if it shows anything on the first console screen. Perhaps I'm doing >it wrong, because the system just freezes, nothing no message on the >screen. I've tried cat /dev/video0 or 1 to

Re: [ivtv-devel] Recording problems with 0.3.8 (lenghty description)

2005-09-17 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sunday 18 September 2005 01:00, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Sunday 18 September 2005 00:38, Leonard Orb wrote: > > I wrote: > > > I'll go back to older versions today - more info to come... > > > > There seems to be no exact break point were the problem shows up. Below > > is a list of ivtv version

Re: [ivtv-devel] Recording problems with 0.3.8 (lenghty description)

2005-09-17 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sunday 18 September 2005 00:38, Leonard Orb wrote: > I wrote: > > I'll go back to older versions today - more info to come... > > There seems to be no exact break point were the problem shows up. Below is > a list of ivtv versions and kernel versions. Status "few" means that there > are some min

Re: [ivtv-devel] Recording problems with 0.3.8 (lenghty description)

2005-09-17 Thread Leonard Orb
I wrote: I'll go back to older versions today - more info to come... There seems to be no exact break point were the problem shows up. Below is a list of ivtv versions and kernel versions. Status "few" means that there are some minor quality problems: locally disturbed pictures, just as if

Re: [ivtv-devel] KM400 & PVR 500 MCE == complete freeze?

2005-09-17 Thread Jelle Kalf
Sigurd, I have the same motherboard + one pvr500mce + one pvr350 + GeForce FX 5200. My system is "perfect" - with video and sound on all tuners. ivtv: version 0.3.9 (development svn snapshot revision 2683) ivtv: Linux version: 2.6.13 K7 gcc-4.0 I have a lean config for a custom built kernel: h

[ivtv-devel] PVR 350+150MCE success story

2005-09-17 Thread Grant Kwok
Hello, Last night after work I picked up a 150MCE ($83 cdn here in a local shop in Vancouver) and I successfully added it to my mythbox with an existing 350 successfully. In fact it went so smoothly and easy that it surprised me (no sound problems). The "trick" was to make sure that the 350

[ivtv-devel] PVR-150 IR receiver pauses every second

2005-09-17 Thread Louie Ilievski
I've always had this problem, but just now decided to see if anyone else had it or of there was any solution for it. I'm running Gentoo on a Celeron 2.6 system and have a PVR-150 and 150MCE in the box. I am using the 150's receiver for my remote. The problem is, it feels like it is always mis

[ivtv-devel] [SOUND] No Sound on PVR350/150 System

2005-09-17 Thread Mathias Busch
Hello, I have a problem with an PVR350-150 combination. No sound on the second card (PVR150). With ivtv-0.3.7(k) I solved the problem by using the 'ivtvctl -d /dev/video1 -q 1' - command. The command 'ivtvctl -d /dev/video1 -Y' shows 'Mute=0'. But with ivtv-0.3.9 the command don't work. The

Re: [ivtv-devel] Recording problems with 0.3.8 (lenghty description)

2005-09-17 Thread kevin thayer
sure, i'll do some testing. Also, it should be noted that i have a 350 in one box, and two 250's in another. I'm not sure which box is the source of the trouble, and i'm not running 3.8 on the box with the 250s. I'll keep you posted. -tmk --- Hans Verkuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturd

Re: [ivtv-devel] KM400 & PVR 500 MCE == complete freeze?

2005-09-17 Thread Sigurd Nes
Jelle Kalf wrote: I have the same motherboard + one pvr500mce + one pvr350 + GeForce FX 5200. My system is "perfect" - with video and sound on all tuners. ivtv: version 0.3.9 (development svn snapshot revision 2683) ivtv: Linux version: 2.6.13 K7 gcc-4.0 I have a lean config for a custom built

Re: [ivtv-devel] Adding support for new cards

2005-09-17 Thread Trev Jackson
On Saturday 17 Sep 2005 10:08, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Thursday 15 September 2005 12:55, Trev Jackson wrote: > > If I run modinfo tuner.ko I see the following module parameters: > > parmtype: probe:array of short > parm: probe:List of adapter,address pairs to scan additionally > pa

Re: [ivtv-devel] KM400 & PVR 500 MCE == complete freeze?

2005-09-17 Thread Jelle Kalf
I have the same motherboard + one pvr500mce + one pvr350 + GeForce FX 5200. My system is "perfect" - with video and sound on all tuners. ivtv: version 0.3.9 (development svn snapshot revision 2683) ivtv: Linux version: 2.6.13 K7 gcc-4.0 I have a lean config for a custom built kernel: http://www.

RE: [ivtv-devel] [SOUND]: please try this patch

2005-09-17 Thread Scott Harris
> > > > There is still a small delay from seeing video to hearing > the audio. > > Usually it is about .5 seconds, occationally 2 seconds. > > So except for that small delay your sound drop-outs are now fixed, > right? I think it has something to do with the automatical level > control settin

Re: [ivtv-devel] KM400 & PVR 500 MCE == complete freeze?

2005-09-17 Thread Sigurd Nes
Jelle Kalf wrote: Dear Phil, Quoting Philip Rowlands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [snip] Often when a box freezes there's a console log showing the reason. If you're lucky, magic SysRq will still work, allowing further debugging. If you can grab the console output (not /var/log/messages), that woul

Re: [ivtv-devel] KM400 & PVR 500 MCE == complete freeze?

2005-09-17 Thread Jelle Kalf
Dear Phil, Quoting Philip Rowlands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [snip] Often when a box freezes there's a console log showing the reason. If you're lucky, magic SysRq will still work, allowing further debugging. If you can grab the console output (not /var/log/messages), that would be useful. I've

Re: [ivtv-devel] Recording problems with 0.3.8 (lenghty description)

2005-09-17 Thread Leonard Orb
I wrote: It is very likely that i can do some more testing with older 0.3.x versions tonight, stay tuned... I have thoroughly tested some older versions now and it is certain that the problem already existed with version 0.3.5z. I'll go back to older versions today - more info to come... L

[ivtv-devel] Re: wiki and mailing lists

2005-09-17 Thread Axel Thimm
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:09:20PM +1000, Ross wrote: > Hello all, > > What is the status of the wiki? I notice that both wiki's (tikiwiki > and mediawiki) are still alive. I don't want to do any work on either > one until a decision has been made and implemented. > > Also, why is the ivtv-users

Re: [ivtv-devel] [SOUND]: please try this patch

2005-09-17 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Saturday 17 September 2005 05:30, Scott Harris wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Hans Verkuil > > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 4:13 PM > > To: ivtv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: [ivtv-devel] [SOUND]: pl

Re: [ivtv-devel] Recording problems with 0.3.8 (lenghty description)

2005-09-17 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Saturday 17 September 2005 01:57, kevin thayer wrote: > Just want to throw a 'me too' out on this one. > > I grabbed 3.8 and i get strange periods of dropped > frames, like it's in 'fast forward' mode. it is not a > playback issue, the frames are dropped in the > recording > > This usually happe

Re: [ivtv-devel] Adding support for new cards

2005-09-17 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Thursday 15 September 2005 12:55, Trev Jackson wrote: > > I've added the patches to svn. Please check it to see if it works. > > With respect to the module IDs: I'm going to see if I can add all the > > temporary module IDs we have now to the official list. > > > > Hans > > Hi Hans >

Re: [ivtv-devel] Fwd: no capture

2005-09-17 Thread Torsten Mohr
Hi, > Firstly, you've specifying *three* conflicting tuner types, but you > shouldn't need to manually specify them anyway. Remove all your > modules options, do a cold boot, then simply do a 'modprobe ivtv' (the > other modules will get loaded automatically). If you're still having thanks, now i