On 9/26/05, Guillaume Lecocq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Hans,Sorry for my late answer, but I had an hard week end :) I'm still withsvn version 2693, but I'll try the latest version and send you my reportas soon as possible.I have a pvr150.For now (2693) :
I have a PVR-150MCE (sold as a 250MCE i
Hi Hans,
Sorry for my late answer, but I had an hard week end :) I'm still with
svn version 2693, but I'll try the latest version and send you my report
as soon as possible.
I have a pvr150.
For now (2693) :
Hans Verkuil a écrit :
Well, it looks like the major sound problems have been resolv
CTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On> Behalf Of Ant Daniel> Sent: 25 September 2005 20:56
> To: ivtv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] Please check: list of> remaining driver problems>>>>
>> On 9/25/05, John Harvey> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
e easy as well.
> If someone wants to create an ivtv logo then it is
> certainly possible.
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ant Daniel
> Sent: 25
] Please
check: list of remaining driver problems
On 9/25/05, John Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Maybe.
I'm actually still working on the initialization but may give up soon and
just submit the code I have that plays the smallest mpeg file I have that
initializes the video. H
On 9/25/05, John Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe.I'm actually still working on the initialization but may give up soon andjust submit the code I have that plays the smallest mpeg file I have thatinitializes the video. However I am trying to to work out what actually
changes when video is de
> To: ivtv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] Please check: list of remaining driver problems
>
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > Well, it looks like the major sound problems have been resolved. This
> means
> > that it is time to evaluate what still has to be done before
Hans Verkuil wrote:
>On Sunday 25 September 2005 18:50, Jan Ophey wrote:
>
>>Hi again!
>>Today I found some time to do some debugging and decided update from a
>>2.6.11 to a 2.6.12 kernel (2.6.12-gentoo-r10) an whohooo... all my
>>problems are gone.
>>I still build it with "genkernel --menuconfig
Hans Verkuil wrote:
Well, it looks like the major sound problems have been resolved. This means
that it is time to evaluate what still has to be done before 0.3.9 can be
released. Below is a list of known problems and what their status is. Please
check this and notify me if I've missed one.
H
On Sunday 25 September 2005 18:50, Jan Ophey wrote:
> Jan Ophey wrote:
> >Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>Well, it looks like the major sound problems have been resolved. This
> >> means that it is time to evaluate what still has to be done before 0.3.9
> >> can be released. Below is a list of known proble
Jan Ophey wrote:
>Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
>>Well, it looks like the major sound problems have been resolved. This means
>>that it is time to evaluate what still has to be done before 0.3.9 can be
>>released. Below is a list of known problems and what their status is.
Please
>>check this and notify m
On Sunday 25 September 2005 11:27, Trev Jackson wrote:
> On Saturday 24 Sep 2005 23:10, John Clabaugh wrote:
> > On 9/24/05, Hans Verkuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 24 September 2005 20:26, John Clabaugh wrote:
> > > > Hans:
> > > >
> > > > I've been following the PVR-500 sound is
On Saturday 24 Sep 2005 23:10, John Clabaugh wrote:
> On 9/24/05, Hans Verkuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 24 September 2005 20:26, John Clabaugh wrote:
> > > Hans:
> > >
> > > I've been following the PVR-500 sound issues with great hope for
> > > finally fixing my sound problem. Un
Hans Verkuil wrote:
But on a more serious note, something new is happening on the 350 that
i've never seen before. I get a whole bunch of wierd digital
noise/pixelation/blocks on it now.
here is a 4.5mb sample, same dmesg from my last post and of course, no
options.
http://dustsmoke.com/downloa
On Sunday 25 September 2005 00:58, Mike wrote:
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >On Sunday 25 September 2005 00:10, Mike wrote:
> >>Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>>What message was that? I can't remember. I know I cleaned up several
> >>>superfluous messages some time ago.
> >>>
> ivtv: ST
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Sunday 25 September 2005 00:10, Mike wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
What message was that? I can't remember. I know I cleaned up several
superfluous messages some time ago.
ivtv: START INIT IVTV
ivtv: version 0.3.9 (
My PVR-500 has sound working perfectly on both tuners (ivtv 0.3.9), and
picture is beatiful. I am however experiencing spontaneous
reboots from time to time. I haven't been able to specifically
nail down what's causing it yet. I updated my motherboard's bios
to the latest which improved things (
On Sunday 25 September 2005 00:10, Mike wrote:
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >What message was that? I can't remember. I know I cleaned up several
> >superfluous messages some time ago.
> >
> >>ivtv: START INIT IVTV
> >>ivtv: version 0.3.9 (development svn snapsh
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Saturday 24 September 2005 23:05, Mike wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
2) No sound on the second PVR500 tuner. Caused by incorrect cx25840
initialization. Copied the sequence from the Hauppauge driver I2C log.
Fixed.
no problems anymore.
9) There were s
On 9/24/05, Hans Verkuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 24 September 2005 20:26, John Clabaugh wrote:
> > Hans:
> >
> > I've been following the PVR-500 sound issues with great hope for
> > finally fixing my sound problem. Unfortunately, I still seem to not
> > have sound on my second tun
On Saturday 24 September 2005 23:05, Mike wrote:
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >2) No sound on the second PVR500 tuner. Caused by incorrect cx25840
> >initialization. Copied the sequence from the Hauppauge driver I2C log.
> > Fixed.
>
> no problems anymore.
>
> >9) There were some reports on reduced vide
On Saturday 24 September 2005 20:26, John Clabaugh wrote:
> Hans:
>
> I've been following the PVR-500 sound issues with great hope for
> finally fixing my sound problem. Unfortunately, I still seem to not
> have sound on my second tuner. I'm beginning to wonder if there is
> something wrong in ha
Hans Verkuil wrote:
2) No sound on the second PVR500 tuner. Caused by incorrect cx25840
initialization. Copied the sequence from the Hauppauge driver I2C log. Fixed.
no problems anymore.
9) There were some reports on reduced video quality with the cx25840-based
boards. Is that still the ca
Hans:
I've been following the PVR-500 sound issues with great hope for
finally fixing my sound problem. Unfortunately, I still seem to not
have sound on my second tuner. I'm beginning to wonder if there is
something wrong in hardware. Anyhow, here is my log info:
ivtv: STA
Hans:
On 9/23/05, Hans Verkuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, it looks like the major sound problems have been resolved. This meansthat it is time to evaluate what still has to be done before
0.3.9 can bereleased. Below is a list of known problems and what their status is. Pleasecheck this a
Hans Verkuil wrote:
>Well, it looks like the major sound problems have been resolved. This means
>that it is time to evaluate what still has to be done before 0.3.9 can be
>released. Below is a list of known problems and what their status is. Please
>check this and notify me if I've missed one.
>
Well, it looks like the major sound problems have been resolved. This means
that it is time to evaluate what still has to be done before 0.3.9 can be
released. Below is a list of known problems and what their status is. Please
check this and notify me if I've missed one.
1) No sound on PVR150.
27 matches
Mail list logo
