On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Ben Lancki wrote:
Sorry to burst your bubble. I'm actually having a hard time finding
any video card that I can use (with xv). The nv driver doesn't seem to
do xv in interlaced mode. My g400 open driver also doesn't do xv in
interlaced and the binary driver from matrox doesn'
Hi,
Ben Lancki wrote:
Sorry to burst your bubble. I'm actually having a hard time finding
any video card that I can use (with xv). The nv driver doesn't seem to
do xv in interlaced mode. My g400 open driver also doesn't do xv in
interlaced and the binary driver from matrox doesn't even do x11
i
Sorry to burst your bubble. I'm actually having a hard time finding
any video card that I can use (with xv). The nv driver doesn't seem to
do xv in interlaced mode. My g400 open driver also doesn't do xv in
interlaced and the binary driver from matrox doesn't even do x11
interlaced. You say that at
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Ben Lancki wrote:
Are you using the "nvidia" driver or the open source "nv" driver? I'm
wondering if nv might give both fields. I think you lose the
capability to do xvmc though, but regular 2d acceleration is supposed
to be good. I can't give up on this, the output from this
Are you using the "nvidia" driver or the open source "nv" driver? I'm
wondering if nv might give both fields. I think you lose the
capability to do xvmc though, but regular 2d acceleration is supposed
to be good. I can't give up on this, the output from this device is
better than anything I've seen
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Ben Lancki wrote:
Cory,
It looks like only the fields scaled by xv are the problem. I can
immediately tell I'm only getting half res because the SciFi channel
logo is blocky. I just read a few comments on the nvidia forum that
confirm this behavior (as well as nvidias unres
Cory,
It looks like only the fields scaled by xv are the problem. I can
immediately tell I'm only getting half res because the SciFi channel
logo is blocky. I just read a few comments on the nvidia forum that
confirm this behavior (as well as nvidias unresponsiveness to fix it).
If you're getting
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Ben Lancki wrote:
Cory,
I've tried several versions of the nvidia driver and based on what I
see and what I've read in the nvidia forums the interlace feature of
the driver doesn't work correctly. The 1.0.6xxx drivers all double the
scan lines, effectively halving the resol
Cory,
I've tried several versions of the nvidia driver and based on what I
see and what I've read in the nvidia forums the interlace feature of
the driver doesn't work correctly. The 1.0.6xxx drivers all double the
scan lines, effectively halving the resolution. The 1.0.7xxx drivers
seem to drop t
Nicer than any tvout on any vid card I've ever seen... would you agree?
Just a quick question... did you use a crystal for the 3.58MHz color
subcarrier? Is that the trimmer cap you're talking about? I had a bugger
of a time getting it calibrated, as I don't have a spectrum analyzer. I
di
Cory, Bryan,
Thanks for the info, I will experiment with other DisplaySize values
in a 4:3 ratio until I find a text size that is comfortable.
Cory, the hardware I built is the same as yours, it uses a 3.579545MHz
crystal adjusted with the trimmer (good enough for the application
we're using it f
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Nicer than any tvout on any vid card I've ever seen... would you
agree? Just a quick question... did you use a crystal for the 3.58MHz
color subcarrier? Is that the trimmer cap you're talking about? I
had a bugger of a time getting it calibrated, as I don't have a
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Ben Lancki wrote:
Cory,
I followed your various comments over the last year and built myself
the same homebrew VGA to SVIDEO converter that you have based on the
ad724. I'm using an nvidia fx5200. I've set my modeline to your
recommendation and adjusted the trimmer cap so t
13 matches
Mail list logo
