On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:58:11 +, trev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Further to my last message I did a diff between the kernel tuner.c and
> tuner.c in ivtv-0.3.2e and found the only differences were:
I completely agree, and Chris Kennedy also mentioned not long ago he
wanted to get
On 02/26/2005 08:40 AM, trev wrote:
I believe modifications to add tuners to tuner.c should be sent to the
linux-kernel mailing list see http://www.tux.org/lkml and will then be added
into future distributions.
They should be sent to the video4linux list: video4linux-list@redhat.com
Gerd has b
Hi all
Further to my last message I did a diff between the kernel tuner.c and
tuner.c in ivtv-0.3.2e and found the only differences were:
20c20
< static unsigned short normal_i2c_range[] = {0x60,0x6f,I2C_CLIENT_END};
---
> static unsigned short normal_i2c_range[] = {0x61,0x6f,I2C_CLIENT_END};
T
Hi all
The version of tuner.c distibuted with ivtv is incompatible with a number of
cards. ( with tuners at address 0x60 )
I have found on my setup that the kernel module of tuner.ko that came with my
distribution works, but even with ivtv tuner.c modified to support cards
with tuners at addr
