BUSINESS

Schumpeter

The wiki way
Sep 23rd 2010
>From The Economist print edition

Two cyber-gurus take a second look at how the internet is changing the world



[cid:image001.jpg@01CB5C06.D6E14DC0]



AFTER Kenya's disputed election in 2007 Ory Okolloh, a local lawyer and 
blogger, kept hearing accounts of atrocities. State media were not interested. 
Private newspapers lacked the money and manpower to investigate properly. So Ms 
Okolloh set up a website that allowed anyone with a mobile phone or an internet 
connection to report outbreaks of violence. She posted eyewitness accounts 
online and even created maps that showed where the killings and beatings were 
taking place.

Ms Okolloh has since founded an organisation called Ushahidi, which puts her 
original idea into practice in various parts of the world. It has helped 
Palestinians to map the violence in Gaza and Haitians to track the impact of 
the earthquake that devastated their nation in January. It even helped 
Washingtonians cope with the "snowmaggedon" that brought their city to a halt 
this year. Ushahidi's success embodies the principles of wikinomics.

Don Tapscott and Anthony Williams coined the term "wikinomics" in their 2006 
tome of that name. Their central insight was that collaboration is getting 
rapidly cheaper and easier. The web gives amateurs access to world-class 
communications tools and worldwide markets. It makes it easy for large groups 
of people who have never met to work together. And it super-charges innovation: 
crowds of people can develop new ideas faster than isolated geniuses and 
disseminate them even faster.

Mr Tapscott and Mr Williams have now written a follow-up to their bestseller. 
They solicited 150 suggestions online for a snappy title. The result, alas, was 
a bit dull: "Macrowikinomics: Rebooting Business and the World". But the book 
is well worth reading, for two reasons.

The first is that four years is an eternity in internet time. The internet has 
become much more powerful since "Wikinomics" was published. YouTube serves up 2 
billion videos a day. Twitterers tweet 750 times a second. Internet traffic is 
growing by 40% a year. The internet has morphed into a social medium. People 
post 2.5 billion photos on Facebook every month. More than half of American 
teens say they are "content creators". And it is not only people who log on to 
the internet these days. Appliances do, too. Nokia, for example, has produced a 
prototype of an "ecosensor" phone that can detect and report radiation and 
pollution.

The second reason is that the internet's effects are more widely felt every 
day. In "Wikinomics" the authors looked at its impact on particular businesses. 
In their new book they look at how it is shaking up some of the core 
institutions of modern society: the media, universities, government and so on. 
It is a Schumpeterian story of creative destruction.

Two of the most abject victims of wikinomics are the newspaper and music 
industries. Since 2000, 72 American newspapers have folded. Circulation has 
fallen by a quarter since 2007. By some measures the music industry is doing 
even worse: 95% of all music downloads are illegal and the industry that 
brought the world Elvis and the Beatles is reviled by the young. Why buy 
newspapers when you can get up-to-the-minute news on the web? Why buy the 
latest Eminem CD when you can watch him on YouTube for free? Or, as a teenager 
might put it: what's a CD?

Other industries are just beginning to be transformed by wikinomics. The car 
industry is a model of vertical integration; yet some entrepreneurs plot its 
disintegration. Local Motors produces bespoke cars for enthusiasts using a 
network of 4,500 designers (who compete to produce designs) and dozens of 
microfactories (which purchase parts on the open market and then assemble 
them). Universities are some of the most conservative institutions on the 
planet, but the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has now put all of its 
courses online. Such a threat to the old way of teaching has doubtless made 
professors everywhere spit sherry onto the common-room carpet. Yet more than 
200 institutions have followed suit.

Wikinomics is even rejuvenating the fusty old state. The Estonian government 
approved a remarkable attempt to rid the country of unsightly junk: volunteers 
used GPS devices to locate over 10,000 illegal dumps and then unleashed an army 
of 50,000 people to clean them up. Other governments are beginning to listen to 
more entrepreneurial employees. Vivek Kundra, now Barack Obama's IT guru, 
designed various web-based public services for Washington, DC, when he worked 
for the mayor. Steve Ressler, another American, created a group of 
web-enthusiasts called Young Government Leaders and a website called GovLoop.
FixTheState.com

How can organisations profit from the power of the web rather than being 
gobbled up by it? Messrs Tapscott and Williams endorse the familiar 
wiki-mantras about openness and "co-creation". But they are less starry-eyed 
than some. They not only recognise the importance of profits and incentives. 
They also argue that monetary rewards can be used to improve the public and 
voluntary sectors. NetSquared, a non-profit group, introduced prizes for the 
best ideas about social entrepreneurship. Public-sector entrepreneurs such as 
Mr Kundra are excited by the idea of creating "app stores" for the public 
sector.

Messrs Tapscott and Williams sometimes get carried away with their enthusiasm 
for the web. Great innovators often need the courage to ignore the crowd. 
(Henry Ford was fond of saying that if he had listened to his customers he 
would have produced a better horse and buggy.) Great organisations need time to 
cook up world-changing ideas. Hierarchies can be just as valuable to the 
process of creative destruction as networks. But the authors are nevertheless 
right to argue that the web is the most radical force of our time. And they are 
surely also right to predict that it has only just begun to work its magic.


Economist.com/blogs/schumpeter<http://www.economist.com/blogs/schumpeter>





Copyright © 2010 The Economist Newspaper and The Economist Group. All rights 
reserved.


http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displayStory.cfm?story_id=17091709&amp;subjectID=348963&amp;fsrc=nwl
________________________________

José A. López
Globomedia, Dpto. de Documentación-Comunicación
jalo...@globomedia.es<mailto:jalo...@globomedia.es>




----------------------------------------------------
Para darse de baja IWETEL pincha y envia el siguiente url
mailto:iwetel-signoff-requ...@listserv.rediris.es
----------------------------------------------------

<<inline: image001.jpg>>

<<inline: image002.jpg>>

<<inline: image003.png>>

<<inline: image004.png>>

Responder a