<http://www.nytimes.com/>[cid:image001.gif@01CAD7DB.17AD1830]<http://www.nytimes.com/><http://www.nytimes.com/>
April 8, 2010
U.K. Approves Crackdown on Internet Pirates
By ERIC PFANNER
PARIS - The British Parliament on Thursday approved plans to crack down on 
digital media piracy by authorizing the suspension of repeat offenders' 
Internet connections.
Following the House of Commons late Wednesday, the House of Lords on Thursday 
approved the bill after heavy lobbying from the music and movie industries, 
which say they suffer huge losses from unauthorized copying over the Internet.
The law makes Britain the second large European country, after France, to 
approve a so-called graduated response system, under which online copyright 
violators face temporary suspensions of their Internet accounts if they ignore 
warning letters to stop.
"The U.K. has today joined the ranks of those countries who have taken decisive 
and well-considered steps to address the issue," John Kennedy, chief executive 
of the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, said in a 
statement. "We hope this will prompt more focus and urgency for similar 
measures in other countries where debate is under way."
The anti-piracy plan is part of a broader bill aimed at stimulating the 
development of the digital economy in Britain.
Many of the original proposals in the bill were dropped in the rush to complete 
the legislation before national elections set for May 6. These included a plan 
to impose a tax on telephone lines to finance the expansion of faster broadband 
connections to remote areas. Under the proposal, every telephone landline was 
to be subject to a levy of 50 pence, or 76 U.S. cents, a month.
Also dropped was a plan to use public money to finance local television news 
reports on ITV, a commercial broadcaster.
The government's anti-piracy plans were also modified in the final rounds of 
negotiations over the bill.
Under previous proposals, which were fiercely contested by civil liberties 
groups, the content industries could have gone to court to seek injunctions 
requiring Internet service providers to block access to Web sites that foster 
piracy.
That clause was dropped from the final version of the bill. But analysts said 
wording inserted elsewhere in the bill could give the government similar powers 
to block access to Web sites.
The Open Rights Group, which campaigned unsuccessfully against cutoffs of 
Internet service for illicit downloads, vowed to turn the passage of the bill 
into an election issue. The group said on its Web site that the votes showed 
that "politicians are out of touch and unable to understand our values."
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/09/technology/09piracy.html

José A. López
Globomedia, Dpto. de Documentación-Comunicación
jalo...@globomedia.es<mailto:jalo...@globomedia.es>



----------------------------------------------------
Los archivos de IWETEL  pueden ser consultados en: 
                http://listserv.rediris.es/archives/iwetel.html
----------------------------------------------------

<<inline: image001.gif>>

Responder a