Hi Gary,
The short answer is no.
This blog [1] entry touches on concerns that the XML community has had
about the 5th edition. I've yet to see a request from someone that
actually needs / wants this.
I'm not even sure you can do a release which conforms to JAXP since the
other standards it pu
Michael,
Do you have any plans to release a 2.12 to support the fifth edition then?
Curious,
Thank you,
Gary
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Michael Glavassevich
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You are looking at XML 1.0 fifth edition which changed some of the rules
> for allowable characters in XML nam
Hello,
You are looking at XML 1.0 fifth edition which changed some of the rules
for allowable characters in XML names.
The current version of Xerces-J supports XML 1.0 fourth edition and
behaves correctly with respect to the rules for XML names in that edition.
Older versions of Xerces-J suppo
Manuel,
2.0.2 is old! you should check 2.11.
Gary
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Manuel Jimenez wrote:
> According to the spec (
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#sec-common-syn), xml names
> could start with the following:
>
> ** **
>
> NameStartChar
>
>::=
>
According to the spec
(http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#sec-common-syn), xml names
could start with the following:
NameStartChar
::=
":" | [A-Z] | "_" | [a-z] | [#xC0-#xD6] | [#xD8-#xF6] | [#xF8-#x2FF] |
[#x370-#x37D] | [#x37F-#x1FFF] | [#x200C-#x200D] | [#x2070-#x218F] |
[
