On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Tomasz Sterna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dnia 2008-08-06, śro o godzinie 02:07 -0700, Mark Doliner pisze:
>> It still wouldn't be beautifully event-driven, but it should be less
>> resource intensive.
>
> Is it really so resource intensive?
> I didn't notice any CP
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Tomasz Sterna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dnia 2008-08-06, śro o godzinie 02:07 -0700, Mark Doliner pisze:
>> It still wouldn't be beautifully event-driven, but it should be less
>> resource intensive.
>
> Is it really so resource intensive?
> I didn't notice any CP
Dnia 2008-08-06, śro o godzinie 02:07 -0700, Mark Doliner pisze:
> It still wouldn't be beautifully event-driven, but it should be less
> resource intensive.
Is it really so resource intensive?
I didn't notice any CPU consumption change on my production system.
(It's still ~5% in peaks ;-) )
--
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Tomasz Sterna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dnia 2008-07-24, czw o godzinie 12:17 +0200, Tomasz Sterna pisze:
>> I will look at the throttling possibilities (instead of
>> disconnections)
>> during the weekend.
>> I have a hunch it is doable. :-)
>
> It's done. http
Dnia 2008-07-24, czw o godzinie 12:17 +0200, Tomasz Sterna pisze:
> I will look at the throttling possibilities (instead of
> disconnections)
> during the weekend.
> I have a hunch it is doable. :-)
It's done. http://jabberd2.xiaoka.com/changeset/639/
It was actually pretty easy - I hooked into _c
