Re: [Jabref-users] Problem with JabRef 3.1

2016-01-02 Thread Philipp Überbacher
On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 15:10:40 +0100 Oliver Kopp wrote: > Dear Philipp, > > > I think Jabref has not switched to javaFX yet. > > Yes, not yet. The discussion around the new UI is mainly tracked at > https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/issues/113. > > With our students team, I think, the work on th

Re: [Jabref-users] Problem with JabRef 3.1

2016-01-01 Thread Oliver Kopp
Hey, Should we switch to https://sourceforge.net/p/jabref/mailman/jabref-devel/? I CCd it and ask to follow up there :) >>> @Devs, what are you planning in that regard? javaFX based on oracle or >>> openjdk or try to make it work with both? >> Try to make it work with both. > With that said, the

Re: [Jabref-users] Problem with JabRef 3.1

2016-01-01 Thread Oscar Gustafsson
>> @Devs, what are you planning in that regard? javaFX based on oracle or >> openjdk or try to make it work with both? > > Try to make it work with both. With that said, the current developers use primarily Windows and/or Oracle JDK, so the probability that it works with Oracle and produces bug

Re: [Jabref-users] Problem with JabRef 3.1

2016-01-01 Thread Oliver Kopp
Dear Philipp, > I think Jabref has not switched to javaFX yet. Yes, not yet. The discussion around the new UI is mainly tracked at https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/issues/113. With our students team, I think, the work on the new UI will start in Q2 2016 the earliest. > Once it does I think ther

[Jabref-users] Problem with JabRef 3.1 [SOLVED]

2015-12-31 Thread Haines Brown
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Haines Brown wrote: >> Suggestions much appreciated. Unfortunately Java 8 has not been compiled >> for my operating system (Debian Wheezy), and so installing it will be a >> challenge. So I'm presently forced to run JabRef 2.11b4 with Java7. >> >> Haines, > Sorry about that

Re: [Jabref-users] Problem with JabRef 3.1

2015-12-31 Thread Haines Brown
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:00:22AM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote: > On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Haines Brown wrote: > > > I installed version 7, but still a version conflict: > > Haines, > >All I can suggest is also installing Oracle's version 8 JDK. I have > another java application that requires Java

Re: [Jabref-users] Problem with JabRef 3.1

2015-12-31 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Haines Brown wrote: > I installed version 7, but still a version conflict: Haines, All I can suggest is also installing Oracle's version 8 JDK. I have another java application that requires Java version 8 and there are apparently some subtle differences between the Oracle

Re: [Jabref-users] Problem with JabRef 3.1

2015-12-31 Thread Haines Brown
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 06:46:00AM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote: > On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Haines Brown wrote: > > > I suspect this is relevant: > > > > $ java -version > > java version "1.6.0_36" > > Haines, > >Yep. That's version 6 and JabRef requires at least 7 with 8 better yet. > > Rich I i

Re: [Jabref-users] Problem with JabRef 3.1

2015-12-31 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Haines Brown wrote: > I suspect this is relevant: > > $ java -version > java version "1.6.0_36" Haines, Yep. That's version 6 and JabRef requires at least 7 with 8 better yet. Rich -- __

[Jabref-users] Problem with JabRef 3.1

2015-12-31 Thread Haines Brown
I was anxious to try out the Christmas special, JabRef 3.1. I did so today, but received the following error: $ /usr/local/share/JabRef$ java -jar JabRef-3.1.jar Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: net/sf/jabref/JabRefMain : Unsupported major.minor version 52.0