On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 04:31:54PM +0200, tobiasd...@gmx.de wrote:
> Dear Haines,
>
> I'm sorry for the problems you have with the way Jabref handles groups
> in the new version. Let me explain what happened: Previously, the
> group membership was stored at the end of the file in one of these
> J
That means in the new version of JabRef all groups are dynamic?
All the best
Josef
>
> tobiasd...@gmx.de hat am 12. Juni 2016 um 16:31 geschrieben:
>
>
> Dear Haines,
>
> I'm sorry for the problems you have with the way Jabref handles groups in
> the new version. Let me explain w
ne)
>2. Re: Groups using not possible (Bernhard Kleine)
>3. Re: Groups using not possible (Haines Brown)
>4. Re: Groups using not possible (Bernhard Kleine)
>5. Re: Groups using not possible (Haines Brown)
>
>
> ----------
2 Jun 2016 11:44:07 +0200
From: Bernhard Kleine
Subject: Re: [Jabref-users] Groups using not possible
To: jabref-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <4c362304-557a-68b1-6327-8978b19ee...@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Am 10.06.2016 um 07:13 schrieb Bernh
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 02:22:30PM +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote:
> Am 12.06.2016 um 14:18 schrieb Haines Brown:
> > I've complained several times in another thread, so far no response,
> > that JabRef 3.4 destroyed the @Comment{jabref-meta: groupstree: section
> > of my .bib databases. The group tr
Am 12.06.2016 um 14:18 schrieb Haines Brown:
> I've complained several times in another thread, so far no response,
> that JabRef 3.4 destroyed the @Comment{jabref-meta: groupstree: section
> of my .bib databases. The group tree is present, but has lost all
> keywords.
>
> I don't see how this coul
I've complained several times in another thread, so far no response,
that JabRef 3.4 destroyed the @Comment{jabref-meta: groupstree: section
of my .bib databases. The group tree is present, but has lost all
keywords.
I don't see how this could have happened through my blundering. I can
recover tha
Am 12.06.2016 um 11:44 schrieb Bernhard Kleine:
> Am 10.06.2016 um 07:13 schrieb Bernhard Kleine:
>
>> I started using groups with the previous jabref version. I have some
>> 1300 bibentries and groups are as large as 140 or as small as 3 entries.
>>
>> When I want to display groups, however, I tri
Am 10.06.2016 um 07:13 schrieb Bernhard Kleine:
> I started using groups with the previous jabref version. I have some
> 1300 bibentries and groups are as large as 140 or as small as 3 entries.
>
> When I want to display groups, however, I tried en vain to see the
> selected entries, mostly jabref
