Bug report for James [2002/03/17]

2002-03-17 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

RE: Class loading solution

2002-03-17 Thread Danny Angus
> -Original Message- > From: Paul Hammant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Goverments need to stop mis-understanding the issue and the hatred of > this thing. They need to compel multiple orgs to do something about it. > This, I think, is getting to the nub of the matter, we aren't (by a

Re: Class loading solution

2002-03-17 Thread Paul Hammant
Harmeet, >- Original Message - > >>Paul is hoping the JAMES team will come up with an RFC that solves the >>inherent problems in SMTP that currently allows spammers to act with >>impunity. Paul thinks this RFC should chart a path that renders all >>current STMP servers wholly incompatibl

RE: Class loading solution

2002-03-17 Thread Lionel Lindemann
> However I would like to see an RFC outlining how to promote anti-spam > measures, and may yet draft something. rfc 2505 ? (http://www.imc.org/rfc2505) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: Class loading solution

2002-03-17 Thread Danny Angus
Hi, Harmeet makes this point well, one of the key features of email is that it is both Anonymous and Push, this means we can all send and recieve mail to&from strangers without prior knowledge, but is also the exact feature that appeals to spammers. Like the phone system. I think that there is an

Re: Class loading solution

2002-03-17 Thread Harmeet Bedi
- Original Message - > Paul is hoping the JAMES team will come up with an RFC that solves the > inherent problems in SMTP that currently allows spammers to act with > impunity. Paul thinks this RFC should chart a path that renders all > current STMP servers wholly incompatible with that f