DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12120] - java.net.SocketException in POP3server

2002-10-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13388] - Spooler loops and add message many times

2002-10-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8861] - Occasionally James gets stuck while processing incoming email over SMTP (from Outlook XP)

2002-10-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13564] - Assorted NNTP Protocol Bugs

2002-10-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13316] - server terminates connection during OVER command

2002-10-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-james/src/java/org/apache/james/remotemanager RemoteManager.xinfo

2002-10-27 Thread pgoldstein
pgoldstein2002/10/27 16:28:15 Modified:src/java/org/apache/james/remotemanager RemoteManager.xinfo Log: Adding a few flushes to ensure prompts are returned to the client promptly. Thanks to Noel Bergman. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +0 -3 jakarta-james/

cvs commit: jakarta-james/src/java/org/apache/james/remotemanager RemoteManager.xinfo RemoteManagerHandler.java

2002-10-27 Thread pgoldstein
pgoldstein2002/10/27 16:26:38 Modified:src/java/org/apache/james/remotemanager RemoteManager.xinfo RemoteManagerHandler.java Log: Adding a few flushes to ensure prompts are returned to the client promptly. Thanks to Noel Bergman. Revision Chan

RE: [PATCH] RemoteManagerHandler

2002-10-27 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Missed one! -Original Message- From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@;devtech.com] Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 14:35 To: James-Dev Mailing List Subject: [PATCH] RemoteManagerHandler Minor correction. The last patch set the default on the output stream to not flush, but didn't catch that

RE: NNTPSpooler bug

2002-10-27 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> Spooler thread reads input articles, processes(moves to > appropriate group) and them deletes them. Understood. >String[] list = spoolPath.list(); > This would usu. return list of length 0. Understood. I thought it quite odd that I would have so much memory committed to th

RE: NNTPSpooler bug

2002-10-27 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> can we push this back 'til the next cycle? Sure. It isn't a memory leak, so much as a delay in releasing memory. --- Noel -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

[PATCH] RemoteManagerHandler

2002-10-27 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Minor correction. The last patch set the default on the output stream to not flush, but didn't catch that the login prompts needed to be flushed. Looking through the various handlers, I'm not sure why we don't simply add a flush to either the end of parseCommand or the loop that calls it, and onl

RE: NNTPSpooler bug

2002-10-27 Thread Danny Angus
can we push this back 'til the next cycle? or is this tabled for this release already.. > -Original Message- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@;devtech.com] > Sent: 27 October 2002 18:14 > To: James-Dev Mailing List > Subject: NNTPSpooler bug > > > Would someone please sanity check me

Re: NNTPSpooler bug

2002-10-27 Thread Harmeet Bedi
- Original Message - From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Would someone please sanity check me on this, please? > Spooler thread reads input articles, processes(moves to appropriate group) and them deletes them. String[] list = spoolPath.list(); This would us

NNTPSpooler bug

2002-10-27 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Would someone please sanity check me on this, please? Here is the output from heap checking after 36 hours: percent live alloc'ed stack class rank self accumbytes objs bytes objs trace name 1 3.76% 3.76% 151312 3153 11322240 235880 7960 java.lang.String

RE: *** PLEASE STOP ***

2002-10-27 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> It is surely part of the process that minor faults will > be be corrected by commiters or contributed patches Of course. Bugs happen all the time. Let he who has written no bugs ... :-) --- Noel -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For addi

Re: *** PLEASE STOP ***

2002-10-27 Thread Stephen McConnell
Noel J. Bergman wrote: Sorry about that. I was a bit ticked off and that may have showed. I do intend to be positive, but it is hard sometimes not to push back. Well until everyone STOPS pushing back at each other, calms down, and focuses on code, this is going to continue to spiral, unti

RE: *** PLEASE STOP ***

2002-10-27 Thread Danny Angus
> As I understand it, the rules are that if someone, anyone, delivers good > code then we are supposed to have a good reason for rejecting it. Seems reasonable to me, under the circumstances, if a change is shown to offer improvements over existing code, and is reasonably implemented, I think any

RE: [VOTE] - Move NNTP to Proposals until it meets the basics of the NNTP spec

2002-10-27 Thread Danny Angus
-0 d. > -Original Message- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@;devtech.com] > Sent: 27 October 2002 01:42 > To: James Developers List > Subject: RE: [VOTE] - Move NNTP to Proposals until it meets the basics > of the NNTP spec > > > Peter, > > One moment, please. :-) > > As I under

James v3 investigatory questions

2002-10-27 Thread Noel J. Bergman
As I have mentioned, I will be at Software Summit (www.softwaresummit.com) in a week. During Software Summit I'll have the opportunity to talk with a lot of folks from Sun and elsewhere about some of the issues we have mentioned as having in mind for v3. Not to make decisions, but to get addition

Release Plan v2.1

2002-10-27 Thread Noel J. Bergman
No, this is not the release plan. :-) Just a step in getting back to it. Peter, would you please revise and post the 2.1 release plan? :-) Previous: http://www.mail-archive.com/james-dev@;jakarta.apache.org/msg03743.html As I understand it, and confirmed with Harmeet, so far we have (lazy) con