Re: Patch for review if someone has a spare moment

Patch seems good and safe to me. Harmeet - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Feature Status

Tetsuya Noel is probably best placed to answer you, but I *think* this table is pretty much correct. > -Original Message- > From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 June 2003 13:59 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Feature Status > > > > Hello, > > I am wonderin

RE: Feature Status

> I *think* this table is pretty much correct. I agree. I'll modify the table to remove the 2.0a3 marker. The official change log for James is http://james.apache.org/changelog.html. The Wiki has a running tally of development changes at http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JamesV2/Plan

RE: Classloader code from HEAD to v2.2

Danny, Thanks. :-) FWIW, the Wiki page was Steve Short's description of pre-classloader changes, IIRC. I'd like to see Marco, for example, test his Jamailet code with the new classloader (in latest/), and adjust his documentation to reflect the new code. --- Noel

[no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

Noel, I'm attaching the final (?) version of the new Redirect and other related mailets. I have tested everything doing my best, but I suggest you and others to test it again. The classes are: AbstractRedirect Forward extends AbstractRedirect Redirect extends AbstractRedirect AbstractNotify ext

RE: Classloader code from HEAD to v2.2

I agree that it'd be worth getting some independant verification, but I've been using this for mailet deployment since it went into the HEAD with no problems (Well ok, one problem but I fixed it ;-) d. > I'd like to see Marco, for example, test his Jamailet code > with the new classloader (in

RE: [no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

Vincenzo, I'll get it committed. In the meantime, would you please look at: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18028 I believe that the new code still has that problem. I've a tentative solution in mind that I'll post after committing your submission. http://nagoya.apache.o

cvs commit: jakarta-james/src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets AbstractNotify.java AbstractRedirect.java Bounce.java NotifyPostmaster.java NotifySender.java Redirect.java Forward.java

noel2003/06/02 15:37:10 Modified:src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets Tag: branch_2_1_fcs NotifyPostmaster.java NotifySender.java Redirect.java Forward.java Added: src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets Tag:

Re: Feature Status

Noel, Danny, On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 12:04:23 -0400 (Subject: RE: Feature Status) "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I *think* this table is pretty much correct. > I agree. I'll modify the table to remove the 2.0a3 marker. Thank you for the explanations. Yes, I agree to remove (or rew

RE: Tests of mail list.

Eugene, The CVS has changes, as does v2.2.0a2 (http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-james/latest/). Give it a shot. You'll still see slow performance for getUserByName unless you customize the sqlResources.xml file for McKoi. See http://mckoi.com/database/maillist/msg01981.html. When you ha

RE: [no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

Vincenzo, In AbstractRedirect.buildAlteredMessage(Mail, Mail), shouldn't the two uses of getAttachmentType() be getAttachmentType(originalMail)? --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comman

cvs commit: jakarta-james/src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets AbstractRedirect.java

noel2003/06/02 17:42:37 Modified:src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets Tag: branch_2_1_fcs AbstractRedirect.java Log: Minor fixes: typo, CRLF line terminator, corrected calls to use the new getAttachmentType(Mail) method Revision ChangesPa

RE: [no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18028 > I believe that the new code still has that problem. I've a tentative > solution in mind that I'll post after committing your submission. Not quite. The new code rendered it as: Message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Next up to try a fix.

about error mail

(B (B (BHello! (BGenerally,If I don't send a mail successfully,I will get a 'error (Bnotice'  mail to inform me. (BBut I can't get the same result on my James server. I think this is because (B (BI didn't config the James server properly.Could anyone give me some (Bsuggest? (B  (BAny

cvs commit: jakarta-james/src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets Redirect.java

noel2003/06/02 20:29:05 Modified:src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets Tag: branch_2_1_fcs Redirect.java Log: Changed getMailetInfo to return the corrcet name. Revision ChangesPath No revision No

cvs commit: jakarta-james/src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets AbstractRedirect.java

noel2003/06/02 20:38:07 Modified:src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets Tag: branch_2_1_fcs AbstractRedirect.java Log: New utility methods to get Headers and Body from MimeMessage. Support inlining complex MimeMessages (fixes bug 18028). Revisi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18028] - Redirect mailet mishandles message.getContent()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-james/src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets AbstractNotify.java AbstractRedirect.java Bounce.java Forward.java NotifyPostmaster.java NotifySender.java Redirect.java

noel2003/06/02 22:07:31 Modified:src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets Forward.java NotifyPostmaster.java NotifySender.java Redirect.java Added: src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets AbstractN

cvs commit: jakarta-james/src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets AbstractNotify.java Bounce.java NotifyPostmaster.java NotifySender.java Redirect.java

noel2003/06/02 22:16:42 Modified:src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets Tag: branch_2_1_fcs AbstractNotify.java Bounce.java NotifyPostmaster.java NotifySender.java Redirect.java Log: Just clearing out so

RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

Yes; I see that in the meantime you fixed it. Vincenzo > -Original Message- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: martedì 3 giugno 2003 1.41 > To: James Developers List > Subject: RE: [no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available > > > Vincenzo, > > In Abstr

RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

Noel, > I'll get it committed. In the meantime, would you please look at: > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18028 > > I believe that the new code still has that problem. I've a tentative > solution in mind that I'll post after committing your submission. I see that you a