RE: [no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

2003-06-05 Thread Danny Angus
> One general question: I have not seen any @since and very few @version > javadoc tags in the James code. Wouldn't it be useful? I tend to > use it very > consistently in my code. Then use it here :-) d.

[no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

2003-06-05 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Noel, > > I'm wondering if the fake sender domain check done in Forward > > should be shared by all the mailets. > > Possibly, but it should only be done if we are going to USE the Sender > domain. If we are just forwarding the message from Postmaster, > for example, > we don't USE the original

RE: [no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

2003-06-04 Thread Noel J. Bergman
To: James Developers List Subject: [no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available Noel, > > I'm wondering if the fake sender domain check done in Forward > > should be shared by all the mailets. > > Possibly, but it should only be done if we are going to USE the Sender

RE: [no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

2003-06-04 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Vincenzo, Committed. Please check commit message. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

2003-06-04 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Noel, Three corrections to AbstractRedirect: 1) was (watch the "r\n\r\n" --> "\r\n\r\n") new StringBuffer(1024) .append(head) .append("r\n\r\n") .append(getMessageBody(messag

RE: [no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

2003-06-03 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18028 > I believe that the new code still has that problem. I've a tentative > solution in mind that I'll post after committing your submission. Not quite. The new code rendered it as: Message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Next up to try a fix.

RE: [no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

2003-06-03 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Vincenzo, In AbstractRedirect.buildAlteredMessage(Mail, Mail), shouldn't the two uses of getAttachmentType() be getAttachmentType(originalMail)? --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comman

RE: [no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

2003-06-03 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Vincenzo, I'll get it committed. In the meantime, would you please look at: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18028 I believe that the new code still has that problem. I've a tentative solution in mind that I'll post after committing your submission. http://nagoya.apache.o

[no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

2003-06-03 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Noel, I'm attaching the final (?) version of the new Redirect and other related mailets. I have tested everything doing my best, but I suggest you and others to test it again. The classes are: AbstractRedirect Forward extends AbstractRedirect Redirect extends AbstractRedirect AbstractNotify ext

[no virus] RE: New Redirect & sons becoming available

2003-05-27 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Sending: 1) Correction to Redirect, 2) new NotifyPostmaster (not tested) 3) new Bounce (not tested, will still change something) Vincenzo NewRedirectAndSons.zip Description: Macintosh archive - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR