> One general question: I have not seen any @since and very few @version
> javadoc tags in the James code. Wouldn't it be useful? I tend to
> use it very
> consistently in my code.
Then use it here :-)
d.
Vincenzo,
Now that the code is in the CVS, would you please submit a patch (cvs
diff -u) instead?
I haven't been using the @ tags at all. Versioning is best left to CVS,
IMO, although not all files are setup for CVS to maintain that
automatically. Go ahead and use them, although we haven't esta
Vincenzo,
Committed. Please check commit message.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18028
> I believe that the new code still has that problem. I've a tentative
> solution in mind that I'll post after committing your submission.
Not quite. The new code rendered it as:
Message:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Next up to try a fix.
Vincenzo,
In AbstractRedirect.buildAlteredMessage(Mail, Mail), shouldn't the two uses
of getAttachmentType() be getAttachmentType(originalMail)?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comman
Vincenzo,
I'll get it committed. In the meantime, would you please look at:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18028
I believe that the new code still has that problem. I've a tentative
solution in mind that I'll post after committing your submission.
http://nagoya.apache.o
